Skip to content

Prospective clinical pilot trial for cost-effectiveness of implants versus restored teeth after forced orthodontic extrusion

Prospective clinical pilot trial for cost-effectiveness of implants versus restored teeth after forced orthodontic extrusion

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00030342
Enrollment
40
Registered
2022-09-26
Start date
2021-02-17
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

K08.3

Interventions

Group 1: Severely destroyed teeth will be restored after forced orthodontic extrusion. Costs and patients perception will be analyzed. Group 2: Implant placement and restoration with srew-retained si

Sponsors

Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 100 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Group 1: -participants in need of treatment of a severely destroyed tooth with 2 proximal contacts and an intact dentition - tooth mobility = 1 - crown-root ratio after treatment = 1 -defects violating the biologic width or missing ferrule design preparation; -prospective single-tooth restoration. Group 2: tooth-limited single tooth gaps completion of surgical, conservative and periodontal pretreatment a American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) risk classification I or II

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Group 1: Molars, teeth with vertical root fractures, ankyloses or hypercementosis, tooth mobilities and probing depths =3 mm at defect location were excluded Group 2: systematic diseases that preclude implant surgery, chemo- or radioationtherapy, chronic inflammation, systematic diseases and metabolic disorders in associtation with bone lesions, ASA risk classification exceeding grade II, medication affecting bone remodeling, fresh extraction sockets.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary outcome is the comparison of quality adjusted tooth years for both treatment groups

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary outcome is long-term success and survival of both treatment modalities

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactMaria Bruhnke

Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin

maria.bruhnke@charite.de+ 40 30 450 662 518

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026