Skip to content

Postoperative outcome after digital amputation using the conventional technique vs. flexor digitorum superficialis tenodesis

Postoperative outcome after digital amputation using the conventional technique vs. flexor digitorum superficialis tenodesis

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00030324
Enrollment
40
Registered
2022-10-13
Start date
2022-12-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

S68.1 S68.2

Interventions

Group 1: Patients who had a digital amputation at the level of the proximal phalanx with FDS refixation Group 2: Patients who had a conventional digital amputation at the level of the proximal phalanx

Sponsors

BG Klinikum Bergmannstrost gGmbH
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Any patient with a revision amputation at the level of the proximal phalanx of a finger Follow-up no earlier than 6 weeks postop

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Amputation of the thumb Contraindications for FDS tenodesis at the time of amputation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Range of motion of the affected as well as the contralateral MCP joint Grip strength (using Jamar dynamometer) in power grip and pinch grip on both sides DASH (Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand) questionnaire adverse events time to return to work pain (numerical rating scale 0-10)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Length of surgery (min)

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactSebastian Leuschner

Klinik für Plastische und Handchirurgie, BrandverletztenzentrumBG Klinikum Bergmannstrost

sebastian.leuschner@bergmannstrost.de0345 132 6850

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 11, 2026