Binary outcomes (consent yes/no) and usual patient-relevant parameters are collected. There will be no investigation of diseases in this study. The content of the study is the (hypothetical) consent itself.
Conditions
Interventions
Group 1: Within the availability of study staff, approaching and offering study participation to every fifth patient measured by administrative intake in the emergency department will potentially begi
Sponsors
Notfall- und Akutmedizin Charité Campi Nord
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 115 Years
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Age of majority, ability to consent
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Minor, incapable of giving consent, lack of sufficient linguistic competence
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Success rate of consents from patients approached for recruitment in the emergency department overall and stratified by urgency, age, and gender. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| - Selection bias: patient characteristics of patients who consented to the BC of MI-I vs. patient characteristics of patients who did not consent. - Selection bias: patient-related reasons for participation in / refusal of the BC or, in the case of no statement by the patient, assessment of the reasons by the educator - Time to first contact between study team and patient after administrative admission in the emergency department. - Time to consent of the patient after administrative admission in the emergency department. - Understanding of the content and voluntariness of the BC. | — |
Countries
Germany
Contacts
Public ContactAntje Fischer-Rosinský
Charité Notfallmedizinische Versorgungsforschung
Outcome results
None listed