Degree of application of pro-seal laryngeal masks in defined surgical interventions
Conditions
Interventions
Group 1: Application of an airway aid (endotracheal tube vs. pro-seal laryngeal mask) in selected surgeries
Sponsors
Schwarzwald-Baar Klinikum Villingen-Schwenningen GmbH
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: We don't select patient groups. Complete documentation according to the outcome.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Incomplete data
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The aim of this study is to evaluate the degree of application of the pro-seal laryngeal masks in relation to further indications (ratio of an endotracheal tube or a laryngeal mask per intervention and reference interval). The data collection will be retrospective from narcotic protocols from our own clinical system "Orbis". The generally anesthesiologic handling will be the same and is not part of this study. We don't want to show a benefit for one of those methods, as this occurred already at another placement. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| We hypothesize that there will be according to the handling of pro-seal laryngeal masks differences between surgical interventions (laparoscopic surgeries versus laparotomies), the age of the patients and the shift plan (regular work versus on-call duty). Beside the data collection we will make a questionnaire, which should evaluate possible retentions and their reasons against further indications of laryngeal masks of second generation. | — |
Countries
Germany
Contacts
Public ContactLena Wiest
Schwarzwald-Baar Klinikum Villingen-Schwenningen GmbH
Outcome results
None listed