Skip to content

Comparison of two balance training programmes on postural control in people with Parkinson’s disease

Comparison of two balance training programmes on postural control in people with Parkinson’s disease - PD-Balance

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00029750
Enrollment
20
Registered
2022-07-27
Start date
2022-08-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

G20

Interventions

Group 1: a) Treadmill training with rhythmic auditive stimulation (4/4 beat, songs), with changing speed, a rope to hold on or a rehabilitation belt for warm-up, 10-15 min b) Task- oriented training o

Sponsors

Freiraum Physiotherapie
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 999 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Males and females with idiopathic Parkinson’s Disease based on the UK Brain Bank criteria (Hughes et al., 1992), Stage 2.5-4.0 on the Hoehn & Yahr scale, ON Medication (Hoehn and Yahr, 1967), age 18-999 years, any ethnicity, Mini-Mental-Status-Examination (MMSE) =24/30 (Tombaugh and McIntyre, 1992) stable dosage of dopaminergic replacement therapy min. 3 weeks before the start of the study or without dopaminergic treatment for the duration of the study intervention, fluent in spoken and written German language.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Concomitant disease(s) (such as malignant diseases, other neurological, orthopaedic, cardiac or psychiatric diseases, major depression, dementia), non-Parkinson’s walking impairment (e.g., due to musculoskeletal symptoms), recent surgical intervention, untreated pain, uncorrected visual or auditory impairment, which would affect training or testing, pregnancy, recent deep brain stimulation (DBS) or change in DBS parameters within the last year, severe motor fluctuations, initiation of a new dopaminergic medication or adaptation thereof within the study period is not foreseen; in the sense of a real-life setting, this decision is the responsibility of the investigator.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Postural control as measured by the Mini - Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest), which also includes the Timed Up & Go with Dual Task

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Fall-related self-efficacy measured by Falls Efficacy Scale (FES-I) 2. Fall rate, based on the number of falls within 12 weeks before study inclusion, within the active phase (intervention) of the study and in the 12-week follow-up period 3. Walking speed, measured by the 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT) 4. Walking distance, measured by the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT 5. Mobility as measured by the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test 6. Dynamic balance, measured using the Functional Reach Test (FRT) 7. Health-related quality of life, measured using the Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39) 8. Feasibility of a larger randomised parallel study based on recruitment rate, retention rate, adherence rate and high safety due to absence of or low/mild adverse events/side effects

Countries

Austria

Contacts

Public ContactBelinda Böhm

Freiraum Physiotherapie

Belinda.Boehm@gmx.at004367763127370

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026