Skip to content

Comparative study - Brushalyze vs. manual tooth brush

Comparative study - Brushalyze vs. manual tooth brush - Vebruha

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00029698
Enrollment
50
Registered
2022-07-18
Start date
2022-08-08
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

K03.6

Interventions

Group 1: Brushing the teeth with Brushalyze at T1. Brushing the teeth with a conventional manual toothbrush at T2. Group 2: Brushing the teeth with a conventional manual toothbrush at T1. Brushing t

Sponsors

Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen Institut für Medizinische Psychologie
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 35 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - from 18 years - Students - habitual use of an ordinary manual toothbrush (2/3 of tooth brushing) - = 20 natural teeth - very good proficiency in German

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Training with a dental background - Braces, fixed retainers, removable dentures - Oral piercing or dental jewellery - Pregnancy and breastfeeding - Cognitive and physical limitations when brushing teeth (e.g. due to arm injury) - Professional tooth cleaning or tooth polishing in the past 4 weeks - No acute or chronic diseases affecting the oral cavity (e.g. diabetes, HIV, eating disorders, herpes) - Not taking medication for epilepsy, heart disease or immunosuppression. - former participation in a tooth-brushing study of the institute

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Comparison toothbrushing behaviour (R1, R5): % tooth contact time (tct) at inner surfaces Comparison plaque (R2, R6): % plaque after brushing (MPI) Comparison handling (R3, R7): direct Comparison handling (subjective rating) Comparison nature (R4, R8): direct comparison bristle hardness (subjective rating)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Comparison toothbrushing behaviour (R1, R5): tct (s); % tct outer surfaces; % tct occlusal surfaces; QIT-S; % tct circular movements; % tct vertical movements Comparison handling (F3, F7): direct comparison SPOC (Self perceived oral cleanliness); indirect comparison handling (subjective rating) Comparison nature (R4, R8): direct comparison weight (subjective rating); indirect comparison bristle hardness (subjective rating)

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026