Prospective, randomized comparison of two types of venous catheters, with a return membrane and without a return membrane, with regard to blood leakage during installation, puncture attempts

Prospective, randomized comparison of two types of venous catheters, with a return membrane and without a return membrane, with regard to blood leakage during installation, puncture attempts - 2V-BP

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

DRKS

Registry ID

DRKS00029653

Enrollment

492

Registered

2022-08-03

Start date

2021-01-03

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Infection risk for the user during venous catheter placement Puncture site infections after preclinical vein catheter placement.

Interventions

Group 1: Control group (puncture with venous catheter without non-return membrane (product name: VasoFix Safety3

Fa. BBraun)) Group 2: Study group (puncture with venous catheter with non-return membrane(product name: IntroCan Safety, Fa. BBraun)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with indication for peripheral venous catheterization Age of majority

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Minority

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Blood leakage on puncture, the expression can be yes/no (0/1).	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Malpuncture (yes/no; 1/0) and signs of infection (inspection of skin yes/no (1/0)).	—

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactUlrich Berwanger

Universitätsklinikum des SaarlandesKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie

ulrich.berwanger@uks.eu06841 16 0

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026