T84.8
Conditions
Interventions
Group 1: Patients with existing varus gonarthrosis and indication for surgical treatment with TKA receive robot-assisted TKA with kinematic alignment.
Different scores are collected to assess pain and
Sponsors
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Age
40 Years to 80 Years
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: - Indication for surgical treatment of varus gonarthrosis - Age between 40 and 80 years - BMI < 40 kg/m2
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: - Gonarthrosis of the contralateral side - Reliant on assistive devices for walking
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Patients with varus gonarthrosis have a higher postoperative AOFAS score after TKA with kinematic alignment compared with patients after TKA with mechanical alignment. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| - The AOFAS score correlates negatively with the measured angle between knee and OSG (FCDT, PTTA). - Patients with varus gonarthrosis have a higher postoperative EFAS score after TKA with kinematic alignment compared to patients after TKA with mechanical alignment - EFAS score correlates negatively with measured angle between knee and OSG (FCDT, PTTA) - TKA with Kinematic Alignment reconstructs the joint line of the OSG closer to the original joint line than TKA with Mechanical Alignment. - Kinematic Alignment leads to a more physiological and ergonomic force transmission in dynamic pedobarography compared to mechanical alignment - Kinematic alignment leads to a more physiological gait pattern in motion analysis compared to mechanical alignement. - Patients with incipient OSG osteoarthritis have less pain in the OSG after TKA with kinematic alignment compared to kinematic alignment - JLO has an influence on the position of the OSG | — |
Countries
Germany
Contacts
Public ContactYvonne Noll
Orthopädische Klinik der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover im Diakovere Annastift, Leitung Klinisches Studienmanagement
Outcome results
None listed