Skip to content

Comparison of the anatomic stem-guided and stemless shoulder prosthesis

Comparison of the anatomic stem-guided and stemless shoulder prosthesis

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00029286
Enrollment
60
Registered
2022-06-20
Start date
2021-11-17
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Primary osteoarthritis of other joints : shoulder region [clavicle, scapula, acromioclavicular, glenohumeral, sternoclavicular joint]. Other secondary osteoarthritis : shoulder region [clavicle, scapula, acromioclavicular, glenohumeral, sternoclavicular joint]. M19.01 M19.21

Interventions

Group 1: Patients who have been fitted with a shaft-free anatomical shoulder prosthesis (Global ICON) in our clinic have their patient satisfaction and pain situation assessed as part of a one-time cl

Sponsors

Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Men and women who have reached the age of 18. - Primary implantation of an inverse shoulder prosthesis - Minimum follow-up 2 years and maximum 7 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Implantation for post-traumatic sequelae - Neurological disorders that limit shoulder strength - Previous operations on the rotator cuff - Shoulder hemiprostheses

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary objective is the Constant-Murley Shoulder Score (CS) of the implants in the follow-up, whereby the value of the stem-free prosthesis is not relevantly lower than the value of the stem-guided prosthesis as the control group.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Assessment of functional outcome using range of motion and clinical scores (Simple Shoulder Test - SST, Subjective Shoulder Value - SSV, American Shoulder and Elbow Score - ASES). - Assessment of strength for internal-external rotation as well as abduction and flexion - Detection of complications

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactYvonne Noll

Orthopädische Klinik der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover im Diakovere Annastift, Leitung Klinisches Studienmanagement

yvonne.noll@diakovere.de0511-5354-649

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026