Skip to content

Analysis of patient satisfaction parameters in conventional versus minimally invasive surgery for rectal, pancreatic, and esophageal cancer in surgery

Analysis of patient satisfaction parameters in conventional versus minimally invasive surgery for rectal, pancreatic, and esophageal cancer in surgery - PAZUKOMO

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00028510
Enrollment
200
Registered
2022-04-01
Start date
2023-05-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-01-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

C20 C15 C25

Interventions

Group 1: Patients with rectal, esophageal, or pancreatic cancer who receive conservative or minimally invasive surgery are interviewed about their satisfaction pre- and postoperatively using a questio

Sponsors

Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden an der Technischen Universität DresdenKlinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Patients undergoing open or minimally invasive (including roboter-assisted) pancreatic, esophageal, or rectal surgery for a tumor condition at VTG-Surgery. - Patients with conversion from minimally invasive to open surgery are also included and studied separately as a subgroup - written informed consent - understanding of the German language

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Emergency patients - Speech problems or impaired mental status - Lack of compliance

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
This is a qualitative pilot study with a quantitative component and no defined primary endpoint. The aim of the study is to analyze which conditions would have to exist for patients operated in the clinic to be satisfied or more satisfied with the course of treatment and its results, and to gain insight into which factors positively or negatively influence patient satisfaction.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
This is a qualitative pilot study with a quantitative component and no defined secondary endpoint. Through this study, it is conceivable to derive improvements for certain clinical procedures in the future.

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactOlga Radulova-Mauersberger

Uniklinikum Dresden, Klinik für Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie

olga.radulova-mauersberger@ukdd.de+49 (0)351 458 4098

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026