Relationship between PROMs, clinical functional tests and biomechanical parameters in total hip arthroplasty patient

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

DRKS

Registry ID

DRKS00028103

Enrollment

100

Registered

2022-02-11

Start date

2022-06-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

M16.1 Z96.64

Interventions

Group 1: Patients with unilateral high-grade coxarthrosis for whom artificial hip replacement is planned Group 2: Healthy, age-matched control subjects

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

50 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Hip-THA patients: age 50 years and older, planned unilateral primary hip-TEP, indication of hip-TEP: coxarthrosis Control subjects: Age 50 years and older, same age and sex distribution, and same BMI and activity status as hip TEP patients

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Hip-TEP patients: Indication for hip TEP: femoral head necrosis, tumour; hip joint on the contralateral side also requiring surgery, pre-existing hip TEP or knee TEP, neurological diseases. Control subjects: pathological joint changes of the lower extremities, which are not age-appropriate, pre-existing hip TEP or knee TEP, neurological diseases, diagnosed functional movement restrictions.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
The subjects come to three different measurement appointments (pre-op, 6 and 12 months post-op). Biomechanical examinations (lower extremity strength, balance and gait), clinical function tests (Timed-Up and Go Test, Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test) and scores of different PROMS (Oxford Hip Score, HOOS, WOMAC, EQ-5D) are performed. It will be investigated how the individual parameters behave in the postoperative course and to what extent there are correlative relationships between biomechanical parameters and the scores of the PROMs and the clinical function tests.	—

Measure

Time frame

The subjects come to three different measurement appointments (pre-op, 6 and 12 months post-op). Biomechanical examinations (lower extremity strength, balance and gait), clinical function tests (Timed-Up and Go Test, Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test) and scores of different PROMS (Oxford Hip Score, HOOS, WOMAC, EQ-5D) are performed. It will be investigated how the individual parameters behave in the postoperative course and to what extent there are correlative relationships between biomechanical parameters and the scores of the PROMs and the clinical function tests.

—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
To assess the results for the THA patients, adequate examinations will be performed with a control group of non-THA patients of the same age and gender distribution and the same BMI and activity status without diagnosed functional movement impairment.	—

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactStefanie John

Otto-von-Guericke-Universität MagdeburgBereich Sportwissenschaft-Lehrstuhl Sport und Technik/Bewegungswissenschaft

Stefanie.John@ovgu.de03916754941

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026