Skip to content

Comparison of patient satisfaction with the use of allogeneic bone blocks versus autologous bone blocks in alveolar ridge augmentation.

Comparison of patient satisfaction with the use of allogeneic bone blocks versus autologous bone blocks in alveolar ridge augmentation. - Augmentation_Benefit Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00027341
Enrollment
32
Registered
2021-12-07
Start date
2022-01-05
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

K08.2

Interventions

Group 1: Bone augmentation of the jaw bone with autologous (patients own) bone Group 2: Bone augmentation of the jaw bone with allogenic bone (human donor bone)

Sponsors

Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients who have reached the age of 18 and who receive bone augmentation of the jaw bone, either with an autologous bone block from the jaw angle or with an allogeneic, human bone block from a humanmdonor, at one of the two participating hospitals (Bundeswehrzentralkrankenhaus Koblenz, Universitätsmedizin Mainz) before a planned implant treatment are included. At the Bundeswehrzentralkrankenhaus Koblenz, both civilian patients and soldiers are included in the study. Both procedures are routinely used in the two participating hospitals as part of patient care.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Excluded from the study are patients who have not yet reached the age of 18, as well as patients who have received or have had bone augmentation of the jaw at another clinic outside of the two mentioned. Patients will only be asked if they wish to participate in the voluntary patient survey during subsequent follow-up.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Stress, pain, nerve damage, swelling, duration to freedom from symptoms, satisfaction. Since this is an observational study based on a questionnaire, both primary and secondary outcome measures are collected via the questionnaire.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Comorbidity due to bone harvesting, preference and opinion donor bone.

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactPeer W. Kämmerer

Klinik und Poliklinik für Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie der Universitätsmedizin Mainz

peer. kaemmerer@unimedizin-mainz.de0049 6131 17 7332

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026