Skip to content

Comparison of patient acceptance and accuracy of digital vs. conventional impression techniques in people with dementia

Comparison of patient acceptance and accuracy of digital vs. conventional impression techniques in people with dementia

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00027119
Enrollment
40
Registered
2021-11-16
Start date
2023-06-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-12-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

F00

Interventions

Group 1: Intraoral-Scan Group 2: impression

Sponsors

zahnärztliche Prothetik
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Dementia diagnosis / Mini-Mental-State-Examination (MMSE) = 24 points dental treatment needs Consent of the legal adviser

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: No dementia diagnosis / no consent / no need for dental treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Feasabillity scanning

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
visual analog scale (VAS) Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) DMF-T (Decayed-Missed-Filled-Teeth-Index) Care level

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactAnna-Lena Hillebrecht

zahnärztliche Prothetik, Uniklinik Freiburg

anna-lena.hillebrecht@uniklinik-freiburg.de015207944388

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026