COVID-19 U07.1
Conditions
Interventions
Group 1: App-guided scheduling and reporting
Group 2: Standard of care (SOC)
Sponsors
Netzwerk Universitätsmedizin Klinikum rechts der Isar der TU München
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: - Indication for SARS-CoV-2 testing as per local recommendation - Access for using an Android or iOS-Smartphone that is compatible with the Study software application - Age =18 years - Informed consent
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: - Current active, laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection - Mental deficiency or any other condition that results in lacking understanding of the provided study information
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Feasibility of a completely telemedicine-based SARS-CoV-2 testing | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| 1. Feasibility of a completely telemedicine/App-guided SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic approach with self-sampling compared to SOC. 2. To evaluate the feasibility of subject selection by a telemedicine/App-guided SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic approach as compared to SOC. 3. To evaluate the feasibility of telemedicine-enabled shipment of samples. 4. To assess the feasibility of syntactical and semantical interoperable data processing and storage following international standards (such as HL7 V2.x with LOINC and HL7 FHIR for GeCCO data), enabling patient-focused telemedicine App/web-based result communication as compared to SOC. Completeness and correctness of data is validated by comparison to relevant FHIR profiles (e.g. the GeCCO data set). 5. To assess feasibility of an automated, low barrier extraction of pseudonymised GDPR-compliant subject/patient-data from a data integration center (MeDIZ) into the Macro4 study data base and DIS for provision for COVID-19 data exchange platform (CODEX), as compared to manual EDC. 6. To evaluate patient satisfaction and patient-reported outcomes of the intervention group as compared to SOC 7. To assess timely effectiveness of a complete telemedicine approach for SARS-CoV-2 testing as compared to SOC. 8. To compare both study arms with regard to cost-efficiency and effects. | — |
Countries
Germany
Contacts
Public ContactChristoph Spinner
IZAR
Outcome results
None listed