Skip to content

Practicability of modern perimetry methods in comparison with the conventional method

Practicability of modern perimetry methods in comparison with the conventional method

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00026743
Enrollment
200
Registered
2023-09-25
Start date
2022-01-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

H40.0

Interventions

Group 1: Visual field examination with the conventional method Group 2: Visual field examination with the modern method

Sponsors

Universität zu Köln Qualitätssicherung für Klinische Prüfungen Prodekanat Wissenschaft der Medizinischen Fakultät
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Diagnosis of glaucoma or other neuron-ophthalmologic diseases leading to visual field defects.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: no glaucoma, age <18years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The aim of this scientific work is to investigate to what extent the pragmatic and flexible visual field examination with the help of two modern methods (VR-glasses and tablet-based perimetry) can complement conventional perimetry with regard to independent follow-up examinations. Aspects such as feasibility, quality of life, and accuracy of content should be considered. The implementation of such modern procedures would mean an economic relief with fewer visits to the doctor and increased cooperation of the patient regarding follow-up examinations.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Mean deviation, Standard pattern deviation

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactSilvia Schrittenlocher

Zentrum für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Köln

silvia.schrittenlocher@uk-koeln.de0221 478 4313

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026