Skip to content

Prospective evaluation of determining the most effective contact for tremor control in patients with deep brain stimulation based on individual tractography

Prospective evaluation of determining the most effective contact for tremor control in patients with deep brain stimulation based on individual tractography - TremTract

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00026596
Enrollment
45
Registered
2021-12-22
Start date
2022-02-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

ESSENTIAL TREMOR Parkinson's Disease

Interventions

Group 1: Clinical determination of the most efficient contact for contralateral tremor suppression. Group 2: Imaging-based determination of the most efficient contact for contralateral tremor suppress

Sponsors

Universität zu KölnZentrum für Klinische Studien
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Male, female, or diverse patients aged = 18 Jahren and = 80 years. 2. Confirmed diagnosis of Parkinson’s Disease or Essential Tremor. Patients with Parkinson’s Disease must have a relevant tremor burden defined as = 2 of 4 points of the item 20 (rest tremor) as measured by the Unified Parkinson’s Disease rating scale without medication. 3. Uni- or bilateral implantation of DBS leads in the subthalamic nucleus (PD) or the ventral intermedius nucleus of the thalamus and the posterior subthalamic area (ET) at least 3 months prior to study inclusion. 4. Availability of imaging data for lead reconstruction and individual fiber tracking (preoperative MRI, preoperative diffusion tensor imaging, postoperative CT or MRI). 5. Patients must be able to consent to participate at the study and to give written informed consent prior to study inclusion.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Non-fullfillment of inclusion criteria.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Target point-wise non-inferiortiy of clinically determined tremor control as achieved by the most effective contact determined by clinical testing Arm 1) and the most effective contact as determined by the imaging-based analysis (Arm 2).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
- Duration of determination of the most effective contact per Study Arm - Non-Inferiority of tremor control regarding tremor at rest, intention, and postural tremor - Side-effect tresholds of the respective most efficient contacts - maximum tremor control achievable by the respective most efficient contact - combined analysis of both target points (STN and VIM/PSA) for all outcome parameters

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactJan Niklas Petry-Schmelzer

Universitätsklinikum KölnKlinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie

jan.petry-schmelzer@uk-koeln.de+49 221 478 84791

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026