Information quality
Conditions
Interventions
Group 1: Web group: Participants, who used web-based information sources of their choice without the EVInews database
Group 2: EVInews group: Participants, who exclusively used the EVInews
database
Sponsors
Klinische Pharmazie, Institut für Pharmazie, Medizinische Fakultät, Universität leipzig
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Licensed pharmacists
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: - Participants, who violated the study protocol (by using other information source formats such as books for example), - non-licensed pharmacists
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Measurement of the quality score medians of the Web group‘s and the EVInews group‘s search results, based on a rating scheme through 2 independent evaluators after the study period in May 2021. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| - Subgroup analysis of quality scores of participants, who completed the entire information search task and who at least completed the search task partially, - Sub-quality score analysis of the rating scheme categories of transparency, quality of evidence, and usability, - Characterization of web-based information sources, - Correlational analysis of sociodemographic characteristics and quality scores, - Self-evaluation of search skills by the participants, - Assessment of the time needed to perform the search task. | — |
Countries
Germany
Contacts
Public ContactThilo Bertsche
Klinische Pharmazie, Institut für Pharmazie, Medizinische Fakultät, Universität Leipzig
Outcome results
None listed