Skip to content

Study comparing analog fall risk assessments with digital Lindera mobility analysis.

Study comparing analog fall risk assessments with digital Lindera mobility analysis. - analog vs. digital

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00025352
Enrollment
60
Registered
2022-06-13
Start date
2021-05-17
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fall Risk

Interventions

Group 1: At time T1, the subjects' mobility impairments and fall risk are assessed using the analog mobility assessments Berg Balance Scale, Tinetti Test and Timed Up and Go Test. In addition, the dig

Sponsors

AG Alter & Technik, Forschungsgruppe Geriatrie
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
65 Years to 120 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: A (seniors): 65 years and older, understanding of German language, being able to walk and sit up and down from a chair (mobility aids are allowed). B (residents of a care home): being able to walk and sit up and down from a chair (mobility aids are allowed) Nurses: the digital Lindera Mobility analysis was performed at least once

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: A (seniors) and B (residents of a care home): any fall events in the week before recruitment, more than three fall events during the last six month and non-consenting capacity

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Capturing the strength of digital mobility analysis results with analog established fall assessments.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Because this is an exploratory study, no secondary endpoint exists.

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactNicole Strutz

Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin

nicole.strutz@charite.de030/450553369

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026