Practicability of the guideline/algorithms developed from the guideline and subjective assessment of the treatment of patients in disaster situations.
Conditions
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: national, in the preclinical care (rescue service, disaster and civil defense) active / interested physicians, rescue service staff, disaster and civil defense volunteers Qualification of medical participants: valid license to practice medicine Qualification of non-medical helpers: at least 48 hours disaster training course
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: -Study exclusion primary endpoint: o if physician is absent and no substitute is available, an instructor assumes the role of physician o in case of absence of at least two non-physician helpers and no substitute available, an instructor takes over the role of a helper ? the evaluation of these groups is performed in the context of an observational study; only the secondary endpoint D) is considered. - Study exclusion secondary endpoint: o No application of chest strap according to manufacturer recommendations: - Implanted pacemaker (SM) - Implanted defibrillator (ICD) - Hypersensitive skin
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| A) Practicability of the guidelines and resulting algorithms and subjective assessment of treatment using numerical questionnaires (multilevel Likert scale) according to (Schütte et al. 2016) and (Brouwers et al. 2017). | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| B) Optimization of the material consumption; computerized recording of the consumed material C) Optimization of treatment time per patient; computerized recording of treatment time D) Evaluation of the stress perception: - after the simulation by means of a validated questionnaire (Bartholomeyczik 2014; Cohen et al. 1983) - during the simulation by means of recording heart and respiratory rate by chest strap | — |
Countries
Germany
Contacts
Klinik für Anästhesiologie Universitätsmedizin Mainz