Skip to content

Evaluation of the S2k draft guidelines "Prehospital disaster medicine treatment guidelines" in comparison to previous treatment strategies using realistic simulation with simulation patients.

Evaluation of the S2k draft guidelines "Prehospital disaster medicine treatment guidelines" in comparison to previous treatment strategies using realistic simulation with simulation patients. - KaBeSim-Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00025071
Enrollment
402
Registered
2021-04-16
Start date
2021-04-18
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Practicability of the guideline/algorithms developed from the guideline and subjective assessment of the treatment of patients in disaster situations.

Interventions

Group 1: Verum group (treatment guidelines) Conduct a simulation using the preliminary treatment guidelines and algorithms developed from them compared to previous standard recommendations. Simulation

Sponsors

Klinik für Anästhesiologie Universitätsmedizin Mainz
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: national, in the preclinical care (rescue service, disaster and civil defense) active / interested physicians, rescue service staff, disaster and civil defense volunteers Qualification of medical participants: valid license to practice medicine Qualification of non-medical helpers: at least 48 hours disaster training course

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: -Study exclusion primary endpoint: o if physician is absent and no substitute is available, an instructor assumes the role of physician o in case of absence of at least two non-physician helpers and no substitute available, an instructor takes over the role of a helper ? the evaluation of these groups is performed in the context of an observational study; only the secondary endpoint D) is considered. - Study exclusion secondary endpoint: o No application of chest strap according to manufacturer recommendations: - Implanted pacemaker (SM) - Implanted defibrillator (ICD) - Hypersensitive skin

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
A) Practicability of the guidelines and resulting algorithms and subjective assessment of treatment using numerical questionnaires (multilevel Likert scale) according to (Schütte et al. 2016) and (Brouwers et al. 2017).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
B) Optimization of the material consumption; computerized recording of the consumed material C) Optimization of treatment time per patient; computerized recording of treatment time D) Evaluation of the stress perception: - after the simulation by means of a validated questionnaire (Bartholomeyczik 2014; Cohen et al. 1983) - during the simulation by means of recording heart and respiratory rate by chest strap

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactStephan Matthews

Klinik für Anästhesiologie Universitätsmedizin Mainz

matthews@uni-mainz.de06131172636

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026