Skip to content

Comparative effectiveness of guided Internet-based stress management training versus established in-person group training in employees – a pragmatic, randomized, non-inferiority trial

Comparative effectiveness of guided Internet-based stress management training versus established in-person group training in employees – a pragmatic, randomized, non-inferiority trial - PragmatiKK_Stress

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00024892
Enrollment
448
Registered
2021-04-09
Start date
2022-07-04
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

work-related stress Z73

Interventions

Group 1: Guided Internet-based self-help stressmanagement: participants get access to an Internet-based training, consisting of 7 sessions. Participants will need approximately 60-90 minutes to comple

Sponsors

Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, Institut für Psychologie, Abteilung Gesundheitspsychologie und Angewandte Biologische Psychologie
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: a) be employed, b) have access to the Internet to complete online training sessions weekly, c) be able to visit group sessions in their local area, d) give their informed consent to participate, e) complete the baseline assessment (T1)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: suicide ideations, assessed by scoring > 1 on the suicide ideations item of the Beck Inventory for Depression II (Beck et al., 1996)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Perceived stress, assessed by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10; Cohen et al. 1983) at 3 months after randomization (T3). The non-inferiority margin will be 2 points on the PSS-10, corresponding to an between-group effect size of Cohen's d=0.29.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10; Cohen et al., 1983; Klein et al., 2016; Reis et al., 2017) (T1, T2, T3, T4) Center for Epidemiological Studies on Depression Scale (CES-D; Radloff, 1977; Hautzinger et al. 2012) (T1, T3) Brief Resilience Scale (BRS; Smith et al., 2008; Chmitorz et al., 2018) (T1, T3) Effort-Reward-Imbalance Questionnaire (ERI; Siegrist et al., 2009) (T1, T3) Job Crafting Scale (JCS; Tims et al., 2012; Lichtenthaler et al., 2016) - adapted (T1, T3) Treatment Inventory of Costs in Psychiatric Patients (TIC-P; Bouwmans et al., 2013), subscale for productivity loss (T1, T4) Health and Labor Questionnaire (HLQ; Van Roijen et al., 1996) (T1, T4) Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL-6D; Richardson et al., 2012) (T1, T4) Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ/CSQ-I; Attkisson & Zwick, 1982; Boß et al. 2016) (T3) Adherence to the intervention - self-developed (T3) Potential moderator variables: Patient Questionnaire on Therapy Expectation and Evaluation (PATHEV; Schulte, 2005) – adapted (T1) Technology Readiness Index (TRI 2.0; Parasuraman et al., 2015) (T1) Preferences for online and group stress management - self-developed (T1, T3) --- T1 = Baseline Assessment T2 = Pre-Intervention Assessment prior to intervention beginning T3 = Post-Intervention-Assessment, 3 months after allocation to study arms T4= Post-Intervention-Assessment, 6 months after allocation to study arms

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactLeif Boß

Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, Institut für Psychologie, Abteilung Gesundheitspsychologie und Angewandte Biologische Psychologie

boss@leuphana.de+4941316771710

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026