Skip to content

T-loop Spring vs Ricketts Maxillary Canine Retractor in canine retraction efficacy and anchorage loss control A Cone Beam Computed Tomography evaluation in a two arm parallel group randomized non-controlled clinical trial

T-loop Spring vs Ricketts Maxillary Canine Retractor in canine retraction efficacy and anchorage loss control A Cone Beam Computed Tomography evaluation in a two arm parallel group randomized non-controlled clinical trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00023776
Enrollment
28
Registered
2021-01-20
Start date
2018-08-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

all malocclusion cases with class 2 canine relationship and need to be treated by extraction of only the upper first premolars and actual canine retraction K07

Interventions

Group 1: Canine retraction according to Burstone Technique using the T-Loop Spring (the TLS): The first maxillary molars will be banded with edgewise bands with 0.022-inch slot height. Four edgewise

Sponsors

Master student at department of orthodontics, Faculty of dentistry, Damascus University.
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
14 Years to 23 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The clinical inclusion criteria: - Aging between 14-23 years. - Having a bilateral class II malocclusion which only needs upper first premolars extraction and canine retraction. - A full permanent dentition - Overjet more than 4 mm and less than 8 mm. - Normal or increased vertical facial high (clinically evaluated). The radiographic inclusion criteria: a skeletal class I or class II malocclusion (2< ANB < 9), and normal or long anterior facial height (N-S-Pog = 64°-68°, MM= 25°-31°).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - The presence of a maxillary canine with excessive malposition or rotation. - A previous orthodontic treatment undergone. - Bad oral hygiene. - The need to extract lower premolars. - Skeletal deep bite, or decreased anterior facial high.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The quality of the canine retraction: this will be assessed sagittally and vertically by evaluating the canine’ center of resistance (CRs3) sagittal movement amount and rate, the resulted anteroposterior tipping, the in-out rotation; the CRs3 vertical movement amount, and the resulted buccolingual inclination; in addition to the root resorption amount. Two Cone Beam Computed Tomography images (CBCT) will be obtained to evaluate those variables, the first one will be obtained right after the patient is enrolled (T0), the second will be obtained after retraction ends on both sides (T1).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The quality of anchorage control: This will be assessed by evaluating the molar’s center of resistance (CRs6) sagittal movement amount and rate, the resulted tipping and rotation; the CRs6 vertical movement, and the resulted buccolingual inclination. Two Cone Beam Computed Tomography images (CBCT) will be used to evaluate those variables; the first one will be obtained right after the patient is enrolled (T0), the second will be obtained after retraction ends on both sides (T1).

Countries

Syria

Contacts

Public ContactAhmad Burhan

Professor, Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus University, Syria

dr.burhan-a@hotmail.com00963944302075

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026