Accuracy of insertion of one-piece ceramic implants with dynamic navigation. A prospective clinical trial.

Accuracy of insertion of one-piece ceramic implants with dynamic navigation. A prospective clinical trial. - CI_MININAV

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

DRKS

Registry ID

DRKS00023688

Enrollment

Registered

2020-11-25

Start date

2021-03-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

tooth loss K08

Interventions

Group 1: Clinical approach A DVT recording is made for implant planning, determination of anatomical structures and the planning of any necessary augmentative measures. In addition, situational model

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: • Switching gaps in the upper and/or lower jaw side tooth area • Free-end situations in the upper and/lower jaw side tooth area • Marker stencil must be tooth-supported. For this purpose, more than 5 remaining teeth must be present in the jaw to be implanted. • The patient has good oral hygiene and compliance. • A pre-implantological hygienal phase must be completed. • Consent has been given by the patient.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: • Persons under 18 or persons who are not able to do business • Untreated acute periodontitis with pocket depths > 4 mm. • Heavy smokers (more than 10 zig./d) • Taking bisphosphonates • Pregnant women • Alcohol or drug addicts • Patients with infectious diseases such as hepatitis or HIV or AIDS • Patients with severe diabetes m. • Planned immediate load

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Accuracy examination of implant insertion The design of the study and the implementation of clinical implementation and evaluation, including statistical procedures, is based on three studies already carried out or still in progress: 1. Retrospective study to determine the accuracy of stencil-guided implantation using a new non-X-ray-based matching method. Vote of the Ethics Committee Ulm No. 339/14 of 12.04.2014. Publication: Schnutenhaus et al. (2016) Retrospective study to determine the accuracy of template-guided implant placement using a novel nonradiologic evaluation method, Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2016;121:e72-e79. Schnutenhaus et al. (2018): 3D accuracy of implant positions in template-guided implant placement as a function of the remaining teeth and the surgical procedure: a retrospective study. Clinical Oral Investigations [doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2339-8. [Epub ahead of print]] 2. Randomised controlled clinical trial on the success of implants after Socket preservation compared to a control group. Vote of the Ethics Committee Ulm No. 41/14 of 06.05.2014 Publication: Schnutenhaus et al. (2018) Accuracy of the match between CBCT and model scan data in template-guided implant planning: a prospective controlled clinical study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12614 Schnutenhaus et al. (2020) Alveolar ridge preservation as influencing factor in the transfer accuracy of the static gueided implant placement: a prospective clinical trial. BMC Oral Health https://doi.org/10.1186<7s12903-020-01155-x	—

Measure

Time frame

Accuracy examination of implant insertion The design of the study and the implementation of clinical implementation and evaluation, including statistical procedures, is based on three studies already carried out or still in progress: 1. Retrospective study to determine the accuracy of stencil-guided implantation using a new non-X-ray-based matching method. Vote of the Ethics Committee Ulm No. 339/14 of 12.04.2014. Publication: Schnutenhaus et al. (2016) Retrospective study to determine the accuracy of template-guided implant placement using a novel nonradiologic evaluation method, Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2016;121:e72-e79. Schnutenhaus et al. (2018): 3D accuracy of implant positions in template-guided implant placement as a function of the remaining teeth and the surgical procedure: a retrospective study. Clinical Oral Investigations [doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2339-8. [Epub ahead of print]] 2. Randomised controlled clinical trial on the success of implants after Socket preservation compared to a control group. Vote of the Ethics Committee Ulm No. 41/14 of 06.05.2014 Publication: Schnutenhaus et al. (2018) Accuracy of the match between CBCT and model scan data in template-guided implant planning: a prospective controlled clinical study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12614 Schnutenhaus et al. (2020) Alveolar ridge preservation as influencing factor in the transfer accuracy of the static gueided implant placement: a prospective clinical trial. BMC Oral Health https://doi.org/10.1186<7s12903-020-01155-x

—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Technical problems Implementation of planning, indication restrictions, functionality and time required of the process	—

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactSigmar Schnutenhaus

Private Praxis

info@schnutenhaus.de+49 7731 182755

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026