Skip to content

Comparison of the Measurement Performance of POCTech CT-100B System, Dexcom G5® Mobile Continuous Glucose Monitoring System and Abbott FreeStyle® Libre System

Comparison of the Measurement Performance of POCTech CT-100B System, Dexcom G5® Mobile Continuous Glucose Monitoring System and Abbott FreeStyle® Libre System - IDT-1844-AY

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00023538
Enrollment
18
Registered
2020-11-23
Start date
2018-10-12
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

E10

Interventions

Group 1: To compare the accuracy, safety and usability of the devices subjects wear three systems for continuous glucose monitoring in parallel. The experimental phase (7x24 h, 8 calendar days) includ

Sponsors

Ascensia Diabetes Care Holdings AG
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 70 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: • Clinical diagnosis of type 1 diabetes for at least one year • Age 18-70 years • An understanding of and willingness to follow the protocol and sign the informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: • Severe hypoglycemia resulting in seizure or loss of consciousness in the 3 months prior to enrollment • Hypoglycemia unawareness • Results of screening of laboratory blood values are in the opinion of the investigator not acceptable and the safety of the patient or study personnel is impaired • Female subjects: pregnancy, lactation period, lack of a negative • pregnancy test (except in case of menopause, sterilization or hysterectomy) • Intake of Paracetamol / Acetaminophen needed • Known severe tape reactions or allergies • History of frequent catheter abscesses associated with pump therapy • BMI < 20 kg/m² • Serious acute or chronic disease besides diabetes mellitus or an anamnesis which might, in the opinion of the investigator, pose a risk to the subject, e.g. seizure disorder, adrenal disorder, dialysis for renal failure, cystic fibrosis, active infection • Any incapacity or general condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, prevents adequate compliance with the study procedures, e.g. mental or visual incapacity, language barriers, alcohol or drug misuse • Dependency from the sponsor or the clinical investigator

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
CGM measurement performance will be measured for each of the CGM systems and will be analyzed using Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) measurements as reference. During dynamic days venous YSI measurements will be used as reference in additional. • MARD (mean absolute relative difference) complete sensor experiments of the CGM Systems versus blood glucose monitoring system • MARD (mean absolute relative difference) sensor experiments of the CGM Systems during dynamic phase versus venous YSI measurements The evaluated MARD will be compared between different system models.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
• PARD (precision absolute relative difference) between the 2 POCTech CT-100B sensors in one subject • Time in range (TIR): • Mean glucose

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactGuido Freckmann

Institut für Diabetes-Technologie Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm (IfDT)

guido.freckmann@idt-ulm.de0049 731 509 900

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026