M75.1 M75.0 Z96.60 M75.4 M19.91 S43.1 S42.20 S42.0 M75.2 M75.3 S43.0 S83.53 S83.54 S83.2 S83.0 M22.0 M23.32 M23.35 M17.1 M17.5 M21.16 M21.06 S83.3 S83.44 S83.43 S82.18 S82.0 S72.3 S72.43 M25.56 M76.5 S83.6 S76.1 S86.8
Conditions
Interventions
Group 1: Intervention group: After recruitment patients receive the German version of the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire in order to measure their current quality of life. The following outpatient consultatio
Sponsors
Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfall-, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: - Willingness, ability to consent and mental as well as physical ability to participate in the telemedical consultation - Outpatient or inpatient stay at the Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, during which an operation and/or conservative therapy has taken place - Ownership of a computer, laptop, tablet or cell phone including a microphone and camera - Stable internet connection - Sufficient knowledge of German to understand the declaration of consent - Patients who come for an outpatient consultation in which a pure inspection and a conversation are sufficient
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: - Lack of willingness to participate in the study - Failure to consent - Neurological diseases that do not allow the use of computer systems - Diagnosis of dementia, blindness or deafness - Need for on-site presence and on-site diagnostics or treatment (imaging, laboratory, stitches, drainage) - Appointments where the patient has to be touched and/or moved by the treating doctor
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Primary objective: Evaluation of patient satisfaction (Modified ZAP-Questionnaire) | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Secondary objective: a) Assessment, whether a suitable deployment of the telemedical video consultation is possible (Modified ZAP-Questionnaire, physicians questionnaire regarding telemedical video consultation) b) Evaluation of the usability of the used video consultation software by the patient (Telemedicine Satisfaction Questionnaire) c) Evaluation of the satisfaction and acceptance of the physicians regarding the telemedical video consultation compared to the conventional consultation (Physician questionnaire regarding telemedical video consultation) d) Evaluation of the cost-effectiveness and potential time savings (Questionnaire regarding economic aspects) e) Determination of the cost-benefit ratio compared to conventional consultation hours (EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, questionnaire on economic aspects). | — |
Countries
Germany
Contacts
Public ContactJennifer Muschol
Juniorprofessur für Gesundheitsökonomie, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen
Outcome results
None listed