Skip to content

Comparative effectiveness of a web- and app-based resilience training in care givers with written coaching versus telephone coaching - randomized non-inferiority trial

Comparative effectiveness of a web- and app-based resilience training in care givers with written coaching versus telephone coaching - randomized non-inferiority trial - RESIST Care4Care

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00023444
Enrollment
448
Registered
2020-12-03
Start date
2020-12-04
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

occupational stress Z65 Z73

Interventions

Group 1: Half of the total sample (N=448, n=224) is randomized into this arm. The participants in arm 1 will get access to the online resilience training and app after randomization. The online traini

Sponsors

Leuphana Universität Professur für Gesundheitspsychologie und Angewandte Biologische Psychologie Institut für Psychologie
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 68 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: informed consent, employed as a professional care giver

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: non

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
perceived stress, measured by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10, Cohen, 1983), before intervention (t1), 8 weeks after randomization (t2), 6 months after randomization (t3) * t1: pre Intervention t2: post Intervention t3: 6 month follow up

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Demographic characteristics (t1) Fear of infection. Items based on: Bai Y, Lin C-C, Lin C-Y, Chen J-Y, Chue C-M, Chou P. Survey of stress reactions among health care workers involved with the SARS outbreak. Psychiatr Serv 2004; 55: 1055–57. (t1, t2, t3) Depression – CES-D 15 items version(Hautzinger, Bailer, Hofmeister & Keller, 2012) (t1, t2, t3) Resilience – Brief Resilience Scale (Chmitorz, Wenzel et al., 2018; Smith et al., 2008) (t1, t2, t3) Gerneral self-efficacy. (ASKU-3) (Beierlein, Kovaleva, Kemper & Rammstedt, 2012) (t1, t2, t3) Optimismus - LOT-R (Glaesmer, Hoyer, Klotsche & Herzberg, 2008) (t1, t2, t3) Kontrollüberzeugung (IE-4) (Kovaleva, Beierlein, Kemper & Rammstedt, 2012) (t1, t2, t3) Self-criticism - SCS (Hupfeld & Ruffieux, 2011) (t1, t2, t3) Social support - (Berliner Social Support Skalen, perceived available support, support seeking) (Schulz & Schwarzer, 2003) (t1, t2, t3) Berufliches Stressoren – Effort reward imbalance questionnaire (Siegrist, Wege, Pühlhofer & Wahrendorf, 2009) (t1, t2, t3) Presentism (Tic-P: Item C1) (Haakart-van Roijen et al., 2002) (t1, t2, t3,) Work Ability (Ahlstrom, Grimby-Ekman, Hagberg & Dellve, 2010) (t1, t2, t3) Absenteeism (Tic-P: Item B1&B2) (Haakart-van Roijen, van Straten, Donker & Tiemens, 2002) (t1, t2, t3) Life Events / general Stressors. Veer IM, Riepenhausen A, Zerban M, Wackerhagen C, Engen H, Puhlmann L, … Kalisch R (2020). Mental resilience in the Corona lockdown: First empirical insights from Europe. PsyArXiv. doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/4z62t (t1, t2, t3) General satisfaction with online training - CSQ-8 (Boß et al., 2016) (t2) satisfaction with written coaching – adapted version CSQ-8 (Boß et al., 2016) (t2, nur Gruppe 1) satisfaction with coaching via telephone – adapted version CSQ-8 (Boß et al., 2016) (t2, nur Gruppe 2) Attitudes towards coaching (t1, t2, t3) Uptake of coaching (t2), self-constructed * t1: pre Intervention t2: post Intervention t3: 6 month follow

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactHanna Brückner

Leuphana Universität Lüneburg Professur für Gesundheitspsychologie und Angewandte Biologische Psychologie Insitut für Psychologie

hanna.brueckner@leuphana.de04131-677-1701

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026