Clinical properties of printed oral appliances compared to milled oral appliances

Clinical properties of printed oral appliances compared to milled oral appliances - Oral appliances

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

DRKS

Registry ID

DRKS00023004

Enrollment

Registered

2021-02-01

Start date

2020-09-15

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bruxism, vertical loss and/or axis I diagnoses after DC/TMD.

Interventions

Group 1: printed oral appliances (OAs) Group 2: milled oral appliances (OAs)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to 90 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with indications for an equilibrated oral appliance, especially in the case of bruxism, vertical loss and/or axis I diagnoses after DC/TMD. Patients with adult dentition without any indication of occlusal or tooth position changes for the duration of the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients without an indication of an equilibrated oral applinance, patients without consent, patients who withdraw their consent, non-compliance. Patients with mixed dentition, ongoing and necessary changes in tooth positioning. Intolerance or allergy to EBPADMA.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
The new material (EBPADMA) is inferior to the established material in terms of service and patient comfort.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
The new material (EBPADMA) is inferior to the established material in terms of antagonistic wear.	—

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactAndree Piwowarczyk

Universität Witten/HerdeckeAbteilung für Zahnärztliche Prothetik und Dentale Technologie

andree.piwowarczyk@uni-wh.de+492302926655

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026