Skip to content

Interindividual differences and psychological predictors for the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary pain treatment for chronic back pain patients

Interindividual differences and psychological predictors for the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary pain treatment for chronic back pain patients - MMSTPP

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00022951
Enrollment
348
Registered
2020-08-27
Start date
2018-10-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

M54

Interventions

Group 1: The studied group includes all patients who took part in the multimodal pain therapy of the back pain center at the University Hospital Essen. As part of regular therapy monitoring, patients

Sponsors

Universitätsklinikum Essen Klinik für Neurologie
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients suffering from chronic back pain (enduring or recurrent pain longer than 3 months) who underwent a multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation program at the Essen Back Pain Center, University Hospital Essen, Germany

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: /

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Co-primary outcomes Change in pain intensity over time, assessed by the composite pain intensity score (mean of current, maximum, and average pain intensity during the last 4 weeks on an 11- point NRS [0-10, anchors: “no pain at all”–“unbearable pain”], see von Korff et al. (1992)). Change in pain related disability over time, assessed by the composite disability score (mean of subjective limitations through pain during everyday life, leisure, and work during the last 3 months on an 11- point NRS [0-10, anchors: “no disability”–“full disability”], see von Korff et al. (1992)).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Exploratory outcomes Change in habitual wellbeing over time, assessed by the Habitual Well-Being Questionnaire (FW-7, sum of scores of seven statements concerning the subjective feelings about habitual wellbeing during the last week on a 6-point NRS [0-5, anchors: “definitely true”- “definitely untrue”], see Herda et al. 1998) Change in health-related quality of life over time, assessed by the veterans RAND-12 health questionnaire (VR-12, which 12-items are summarized in a physical and a mental health measure [PCS-physical component score & MCS-mental component score], derived from the Veterans RAND 36, see Kazis et al. (2006) Change in pain-related self-efficacy over time, assessed by the German FESS questionnaire (Mangels, Schwarz, Sohr, Holme & Rief, 2009) Change in acceptance of pain over time, assessed by the CPAQ (Nilges, Köster & Schmidt, 2011) Change in incapacity for work over time, operationalized by the days the patient was incapable of work during the last three months (0-92 days) Potential predictors Baseline scores of pain intensity, pain-related disability, habitual wellbeing, health-related quality of life (physical and mental health), pain-related self-efficacy, acceptance of pain and incapacity for work, assessed by means mentioned above Baseline severity of chronification, assessed by the von Korff index (von Korff, Ormel et al. 1992) Baseline anxiety, stress, and depression scores, assessed by the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (Lovibond & Lovibond, 1995) Baseline treatment expectancy and credibility, assessed by the credibility/expectancy questionnaire (Devilly & Borkovec, 2000) Age, gender, setting and duration of treatment

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactDustin Maser

Universitätsklinikum Essen Klinik für Neurologie

dustin.maser@uk-essen.de02017232446

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026