Skip to content

Randomized comparison of different reconstruction techniques for digital nerve coaptation

Randomized comparison of different reconstruction techniques for digital nerve coaptation - FINGERPRINT

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00022889
Enrollment
72
Registered
2020-09-15
Start date
2020-09-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

S64

Interventions

Group 1: Suture-based nerve coaptation Group 2: Tissue adhesive-based nerve coaptation

Sponsors

Universitätsklinikum Regensburg
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Complete DN injury of a digit - Uni- or bilateral DN injury of a digit - Single or multiple DN injuries - Height of lesion: Lesion at / distal to A1 pulley - Primary nerve suture (direct reconstruction or reconstruction with grafts/ nerve conduits)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Incomplete DN lesions - Secondary nerve reconstruction - Pregnancy/ nursing period - Diabetes mellitus, peripheral polyneuropathy or other neurological diseases interfering with nerve regeneration - Known nerve compression syndrome of the upper extremity - Previous surgery/ injury affecting the digit - Patients under legal care - Minors (< 18 years)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Clinical assessment of sensory regeneration within 12 months postoperatively.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Clinical assessment of complications (e.g., neuroma, cold intolerance) within 12 months postoperatively.

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactAlexandra Anker

Abteilung für Plastische, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie

alexandra.anker@ukr.de09417820

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026