I10
Conditions
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: • = 65 years • Diagnosed essential hypertension (grade I) • Independent mobility • Presence of subject information and signed consent
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: • Existence of legal support • MCI and severe cognitive impairments (TICS <31 pts.) • Increased risk of falling (Tinetti test <20 points) • Diseases associated with a high risk of falling (stroke, Parkinson's) • dizziness • Severe visual impairment • rice sickness • Pacemaker • Blood pressure at rest above 200/110 mmHg
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The primary aim is to achieve the individual intensity of exertion. To achieve this, a comparison is made with the individually specified intensity of exertion by means of continuous pulse monitoring via a wearable. The study will take place in October 2020. Used assessments are: - Borg Scale (Borg, 1990) - NASA TLX (Task Load Index) (Xiao et al., 2005) Another primary aim is the evaluation of user friendliness. Used assessments are: - TUI-Post (Kothgassner et al., 2014) - UEQ (Laugwitz et al., 2009) | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| - Presence Questionnaire (PQ) (Witmer & Singer, 1998) - Immersive Tendencies Questionnaire (ITQ) (Witmer & Singer, 1998) - Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ) (Kennedy et al.,1993) - Gratch report scale (Gratch et al., 2007; Wang & Gratch, 2009) - Scale for the rating of Uncanny Valley effects (Ho & MacDorman, 2017) Guideline-based individual interviews on the following topic: - What was good/not so good? - What caused problems? - How was the training under VR glasses? - How was the overall duration? - Were the breaks sufficient? - How did you like the Avatar? - How do you rate the UI features? | — |
Countries
Germany
Contacts
Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin - Forschungsgruppe Geriatrie