Skip to content

Minimally invasive video-assisted parathyroidectomy (MIVAP) vs. conventional parathyroidectomy in patients with renal hyperparathyroidism: results of a multicenter retrospective comparative study.

Minimally invasive video-assisted parathyroidectomy (MIVAP) vs. conventional parathyroidectomy in patients with renal hyperparathyroidism: results of a multicenter retrospective comparative study.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00022545
Enrollment
102
Registered
2020-12-14
Start date
2021-01-18
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

E21.1 E21.2

Interventions

Group 1: Open parathyroidectomy as a control procedure. The patients will be questioned by post or by telephone according to the POSAS scale version 2.0 to assess the postoperative scar and SF-12 shee

Sponsors

Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum. Chirurgische Klinik.
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with verified renal HPT after MIVAP or after conventional parathyroidectomy.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with incomplete data collection. 2. Patients who refuse our survey or who cannot be found for the survey.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1) Duration of the procedure (minutes); 2) Duration of the postoperative inpatient stay (days); 3) Intra- and postoperative complications (recurrent palsy, postoperative hypoparathyroidism, bleeding, persistent hyperparathyroidism, other complications); 4) Percentage decrease in parathyroid hormone level (PTH) after the operation (PTH after the operation / PHT before the operation as a proportion). This data will be extracted from the hospital information system (HIS) of the respective clinic.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1) Conversion rate (only for MIVAP); 2) Scar length (in cm); 3) Cosmetic satisfaction (total points according to POSAS scale version 2.0); 4) Assessment of the quality of life (questionnaires on the health status SF-12 will be evaluated using the evaluation sheet SF-12 from Testzentrale Hogrefe Verlag GmbH and 2 values will be determined for each respondent: physical sum scale (KSK) and psychological sum scale (PSK); 5) Late recurrences and re-operations (as yes / no data); 6) Extent of the procedure (only parathyroidectomy, simultaneous with replantation of the parathyroid glands, simultaneous with thyroid resection); 7) Number of parathyroid glands removed; The data from points 1, 2, 6, 7 will be extracted from the hospital information system (HIS) of the respective clinic. The data from points 3, 4, 5 will be determined during the postal / telephone survey of the patients.

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactIurii Snopok

Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum. Chirurgische Klinik.

iurii.snopok@kk-bochum.de(0234) 299-0

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026