Skip to content

Benefit of remote wireless microphone technologies for everyday-life communication in bilateral CI recipients

Benefit of remote wireless microphone technologies for everyday-life communication in bilateral CI recipients - AÜS-CI

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00022389
Enrollment
46
Registered
2020-07-09
Start date
2020-11-27
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

bilareral severe-to-profound hearing loss

Interventions

Group 1: application of wireless audio transmission systems (ATS) Group 2: application of a wireless directional microphone technology of the CI

Sponsors

Universitätsklinikum Freiburg Klinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde Sektion Cochlear Implant
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All study participants must meet the following inclusion criteria: - Age: = 18 years - Mother tongue: German The following inclusion criteria also apply to all study patients: - Hearing thresholds right, left: = 80 dB HL on average over the frequencies 500 Hz, 1 kHz, 2 kHz and 4 kHz - bilateral CI fitting - Implants both sides: CI24M, CI24R, CI24RE, CI500 Series, CI600 Series - CI processors: CP9X0 series or CP1000 - Hearing experience with both CI: = 6 months - Speech understanding with both CI: SVS with OLSA for S0N0 = 5 dB SNR. The study subjects have hearing thresholds of = 20 dB HL in both ears at all frequencies up to 8 kHz.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: All study participants: - cognitive impairment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
determination of the benefit of the ATS Minimicrophone 2+ in directional microphone mode with regard to the speech reception threshold (SRT) in noise from bilaterally supplied CI recipients (BiCI group) in a restaurant scene as the difference between the SRT when using the Minimicrophone 2+ in directional microphone mode with both CP1000 CI sound processors with deactivated processor microphones and the SVS when exclusively using both CP1000 with activated directional microphone technology ForwardFocus

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
determination of the benefit of the ATS Minimicrophone 2+ in omnidirectional microphone mode with regard to the SRT in noise of bilaterally supplied CI recipients in a restaurant scene as the difference between the SRT when using the Minimicrophone 2+ in omnidirectional microphone mode with both CP1000 CI sound processors with deactivated processor microphones and the SRT when exclusively using both CP1000 with activated directional microphone technology ForwardFocus

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactThomas Wesarg

Universitätsklinikum Freiburg Klinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde Sektion Cochlear Implant

thomas.wesarg@uniklinik-freiburg.de0761/270-72749

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026