Z46.3
Conditions
Interventions
Group 1: Fabrication of the bridge
For all abutment teeth box-shaped occluso-proximal cavities were prepared to embed the wire. If possible the cavities of existing (composite) restorations were used
Sponsors
Universität Bern Klinik für Zahnerhaltung, Präventiv- und Kinderzahnmedizin
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Age
0 Years to 99 Years
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria are as followed: • adhesively bonded direct MRC-FPD including • anterior or posterior teeth • lower or upper jaws • uni- or bilateral extensions
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria were as followed: • indirect MRC-FPD
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Clinical assessment of the status of the DMRC -FPD will be done by the dentist who placed the restoration when patients attend for routine care, recall or when a problem occurrs. The observation period will start with the insertion of the DMRC -FPD. Primary Outcome (Functional survival): The intervention was considered as a ‘survival’ if the type of restoration was still the same. Consequently, repair or replacement of the DMRC -FPD was considered as survival. Whenever a different restoration type was inserted, an abutment tooth extracted or one of these treatments scheduled at the last check-up intervention was defined as failure (primary aim). | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Secondary Outomce (Success): When the restoration was still in function at the last check-up visit and without any need of therapy, the intervention was defined as success. Whenever the restoration was replaced, repaired, recemented or scheduled for these treatments at the last check-up the intervention was defined as failure . | — |
Countries
Switzerland
Contacts
Public ContactRichard Wierichs
Universität Bern Klinik für Zahnerhaltung, Präventiv- und Kinderzahnmedizin
Outcome results
None listed