Implementation and evaluation of the MoSi®-training & prevention program

Implementation and evaluation of the MoSi®-training & prevention program - MoSi®

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

DRKS

Registry ID

DRKS00021421

Enrollment

238

Registered

2020-04-22

Start date

2020-05-12

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

R42 R26.8

Interventions

Group 1: Once the prerequisites have been met (see inclusion and exclusion criteria), the selected participants will be invited by post to the five-week MoSi® training course. The training dates, loca

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

65 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Seniors aged 65 and over written and spoken German Written consent of the participant to participate in the study The participant must be able to implement verbal instructions in motor skills The participant must be able to fully load the knee and/or hip TEP (OP at least 6 weeks ago) The participant must be able to stand and walk freely and without assistance The participant must be able to walk at least 30 m without his walking aid The participant must be able to walk at least 10 m without pain The participant does not suffer from an acute infection

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Participants < 65 years Lack of written and spoken German skills Lack of written consent of the participant to participate in the study The participant may only partially load The participant is not able to motorize verbal instructions The participant is not able to stand and walk freely and without assistance The participant is not able to walk at least 30 m without help The participant is not able to walk at least 10 m without pain The participant suffers from an acute infection

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
H1 The results of the assessment tools: (1) the BORG scale, (2) the Timed-Up & Go test, (3) the Functional-Reach Test, (4) the finger-ground distance measurement, (5) the Sit-To-Stand test and (6) the hand force measurement (JAMAR®) after the first MoSi® training unit show significant changes in comparison to the results of the assessment instruments after the 10th training unit of the total five-week training phase. H2 The results of the FES-I questionnaire, which indicate an increased fear of falling within the activities of daily life, show a correlation with the results (1) of the BORG scale, (2) the Timed-Up & Go test, (3) the Functional-Reach Test, (4) the finger-ground distance measurement, (5) the Sit-To-Stand test and (6) the hand force measurement (JAMAR®) H3 Participants of the MoSi® Training & Prevention Program who report a fall in the last 12 months to = benefit less from MoSi® than those who have no history of falls.	—

Measure

Time frame

H1 The results of the assessment tools: (1) the BORG scale, (2) the Timed-Up & Go test, (3) the Functional-Reach Test, (4) the finger-ground distance measurement, (5) the Sit-To-Stand test and (6) the hand force measurement (JAMAR®) after the first MoSi® training unit show significant changes in comparison to the results of the assessment instruments after the 10th training unit of the total five-week training phase. H2 The results of the FES-I questionnaire, which indicate an increased fear of falling within the activities of daily life, show a correlation with the results (1) of the BORG scale, (2) the Timed-Up & Go test, (3) the Functional-Reach Test, (4) the finger-ground distance measurement, (5) the Sit-To-Stand test and (6) the hand force measurement (JAMAR®) H3 Participants of the MoSi® Training & Prevention Program who report a fall in the last 12 months to = benefit less from MoSi® than those who have no history of falls.

—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1. if the assessment results of the individual MoSi® courses differ in the course of the project (e.g. comparison of the results from the 1st MoSi® course with the results from the 2nd and 3rd, etc.) 2. on the basis of the assessment results of the MoSi® participants, a statement can be made as to whether an age group (e.g. division into 5-year steps or decades) benefits particularly from their participation in the MoSi® training. 3. if a participant repeatedly takes part in the MoSi® Training & Prevention Program within the project period, does this participant differ in terms of the assessment results from the follow-up course from the results of his or her first or those participants who have only taken part in a MoSi® course?	—

Measure

Time frame

1. if the assessment results of the individual MoSi® courses differ in the course of the project (e.g. comparison of the results from the 1st MoSi® course with the results from the 2nd and 3rd, etc.) 2. on the basis of the assessment results of the MoSi® participants, a statement can be made as to whether an age group (e.g. division into 5-year steps or decades) benefits particularly from their participation in the MoSi® training. 3. if a participant repeatedly takes part in the MoSi® Training & Prevention Program within the project period, does this participant differ in terms of the assessment results from the follow-up course from the results of his or her first or those participants who have only taken part in a MoSi® course?

—

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactBianca Weyermann

Geriatrie-Zentrum Erlangen Malteser Waldkrankenhaus St. Marien gGmbH

bianca.weyermann@waldkrankenhaus.de09131-822 3197

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026