Skip to content

Cemented versus Uncemented Partial Knee Arthroplasty Trial – The CUPKAT Trial – A prospective, randomized controlled trial

Cemented versus Uncemented Partial Knee Arthroplasty Trial – The CUPKAT Trial – A prospective, randomized controlled trial - CUPKAT

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00021303
Enrollment
306
Registered
2020-04-30
Start date
2020-05-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

M17.9

Interventions

Group 1: cementless UKR Group 2: cemented UKR

Sponsors

Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: indication for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty according to the Oxford UKA criteria (J. W. Goodfellow et al., 1988) - Anteromedial osteoarthritis with full thickness cartilage loss of the medial compartment - Well preserved lateral compartment on valgus stress xray images - Passively correctable intra-articular varus deformity - Age 18 years or older - Ability of subject to understand character and individual consequences of the clinical Trial Signed informed consent (must be available before enrollment in the trial)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients found to be unsuitable for Oxford UKA before or during surgery - Preoperative extension limitation greater than 15 degrees and/or maximal flexion of less than 100 degrees - severe lateral patellar facet OA with bone loss and grooving - Functionally insufficient anterior cruciate ligament - History of hypersensitivity reaction to metal implants made of cobalt-chromium-alloys - All forms of inflammatory arthritis (such as rheumatoid arthritis) - Patients with previous PTO (proximal tibial osteotomy) - Patients with intraarticular fracture and tibial condyle fracture sequelae - History of septic arthritis - Senile dementia - Insufficient knowledge of the German language (written and spoken) - Participation in other clinical trials or observation period of competing trials, respectively. - Patient is pregnant or considered a member of a protected population (e.g., prisoner, mentally incompetent, etc.) (Inclusion of such patients will have different regulations implications)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
-Comparison of clinical and functional results 2 years after cemented versus uncemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) being the primary Outcome parameter

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
-American Knee Society Score (AKSS): measures rangeof motion and function of the knee - UCLA Activity Score: measurement of patient activity level in arthroplasty patients with mid/lower level activity - Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Forgotten Knee Score (FJS-12): assessment of joint awareness in knee patients - Visual Analog Pain Score (VAS): measurement of patient subjective pain levels - Satisfaction with the implant - Radiographic features including signs of implant loosening and radiolucency lines - Duration of surgery and blood loss - Length of hospital stay - Complications (including periprosthetic fracture) - Re-operation rate Change in bone mineral density (via DXA) around the femoral and tibial components preoperatively and two years after surgery

Countries

Austria, Germany

Contacts

Public ContactEmanuela Dabbeni

Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Universität Heidelberg

emanuela.dabbeni@med.uni-heidelberg.de06221 56 35286

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026