Skip to content

The rationale and design of the Lungemphysema Registry: a prospective Multicenter observational study

The rationale and design of the Lungemphysema Registry: a prospective Multicenter observational study - LE-Registry

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00021207
Enrollment
500
Registered
2020-05-29
Start date
2017-09-12
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

COPD concomitant with severe lung emphysema

Interventions

Group 1: Patients with severe lung emphysema undergoing lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) or endoscopic lung volume reduction (ELVR) with the endobronchial implantation of valves. Before treatment

Sponsors

Department of Pneumology-Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: • The medication of COPD patients must be adjusted excellent • A proof of nicotin restriction for over 3 months (COHb50mmHg a consultation in a center for pulmonary hypertension is required. • Dyspnea must be caused primarily due to hyperinflation • The following cutoff criteria are established for the lung function: FEV1180%, total lung volume (TLC) >100% • Significant limitation of patients mobility, defined by the 6-minutes walking test <450m • Software dependent quantification of emphysema score per lung lobe, as shown in computed tomography • For the treatment with valves: absence of collateral ventilation in the target lobe assessed by Chartis ® assessment in a bronchoscopy or by software dependent analysis of fissure integrity

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: -Patients with a significant hypercapnia (pCO2 <55mmHg) - Absence of collateral ventilation for implantation of endobronchial valves -Current cigarette smoking

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary hypothesis of the study is to find out which treatment strategy results in a higher improvement of FEV1 over time.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The secondary hypothesis is to determine the treatment approaches that contribute to a crucial clinical improvement that contribute to a crucial improvement of the patients quality of life ((6-MWT CAT, MMRC, SGRQ).

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactChristian Grah

Department of Pneumology- Havelhöhe Clinic

cgrah@me.com030 36501280

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 9, 2026