Skip to content

A randomized, evaluator-blind comparative study with a long-term extension to evaluate performance and safety of Belotero® Balance and no-treatment control for the treatment of facial acne scars

A randomized, evaluator-blind comparative study with a long-term extension to evaluate performance and safety of Belotero® Balance and no-treatment control for the treatment of facial acne scars - ASIIT

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00021121
Enrollment
40
Registered
2020-03-18
Start date
2020-04-06
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

facial acne scars L90.5

Interventions

Group 1: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Belotero® Balance for the treatment of acne scars on the face. After randomization, either the left or right half of the f

Sponsors

Rosenpark Research GmbH
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 55 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Presence of facial acne scars within the treatment area on each cheek. 2. Symmetric scar severity on both cheeks as assessed by the Blinded Evaluator. 3. Intent to undergo treatment of facial acne scars. 4. Men or women aged 18 to 55 years, inclusive. 5. Ability to adequately understand and accept the obligation to follow study instruction. 6. Signed and dated informed consent to participate in the study 7. Ability to read and complete questionnaires provided in local language. 8. Cooperative and willing to comply with the instructions and procedures.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Acute acne with inflammatory component within 6 months before baseline. 2. Start or dose change of isotretinoin within 6 months before baseline. 3. Pregnant, breast-feeding women, women who intent to get pregnant within the next 24 months, or women who are of childbearing potential and not practicing a reliable method of birth control. 4. Known/previous allergy or hypersensitivity to local anesthetics, e.g. lidocaine or other amide-type anesthetics. 5. History of bleeding disorders in the opinion of the Treating Investigator 6. Any medical condition or concomitant medication that, in the opinion of the Treating Investigator, has the potential to interfere with the investigation or increase the risk of adverse events. 7. Any history of aesthetic treatments that, in the opinion of the Treating Investigator, has the potential to interfere with the investigation or increase the risk of adverse events. 8. Active skin disease, inflammation or related conditions, such as but not limited to infections, perioral dermatitis, seborrheic eczema, rosacea, psoriasis, or herpes zoster or herpes simplex in the face. 9. Presence of facial hair that may interfere with performance evaluations. 10. Severe pre-aged skin. 11. Any other condition preventing the subject from entering the study in the Investigator’s opinion, e.g. subjects not likely to avoid other facial aesthetic treatments, subjects anticipated to be unreliable, unavailable or incapable of understanding the study assessments or having unrealistic expectations of the treatment result. 12. Study site personnel, close relatives of the study site personnel, or close relatives of employees at the Sponsor company. 13. Subject who is imprisoned or is lawfully kept in an institution. 14. Patients currently participating in any other clinical trial or within 28 days before treatment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Primary Objectives: The primary objective of the study is to show greater aesthetic improvement in facial acne scars treated with Belotero® Balance compared with untreated facial acne scars in the same subject using a split-face design. The primary endpoint is the proportion of subjects for whom the treated side has a higher grade of aesthetic improvement (GAIS) compared to the untreated side at live assessment by a Blinded Evaluator 6 months after baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary Objectives: • Aesthetic improvement of facial acne scars using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) by the subject and Treating Investigator at month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 compared to baseline. • Aesthetic improvement of facial acne scars using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) by the Blinded Evaluator at month 3 and 6 compared to baseline. • Overall severity of facial acne scars using the Investigator’s Scar Global Assessment (SGA) by Blinded Evaluator at baseline, month 3 and 6. • Overall severity of facial acne scars using the Self-assessment of Clinical Acne-Related Scars (SCARS) by subject at baseline and month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24. • Impact on quality of life using the facial acne scar quality of life (FASQoL) by subject at baseline and month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24. • Skin topography measurement using structured-light 3D scanner (PRIMOSLargeField, Canfield Scientific) at baseline and month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24. • Skin mechanical properties of selected scars using cutometry at baseline and month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24. • Subjects satisfaction with treatment result using subject questionnaires at month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24. • Local tolerability by the assessment of post-treatment events after each treatment. • Short- and long-term safety throughout the entire study by collecting AEs and device deficiencies.

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactNils Krüger

Rosenpark Research GmbH

nils.krueger@rosenparkresearch.de0049-6151 627 070

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026