Impact of anatomical bladder neck preservation on functional and oncologic outcomes after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical Prostatectomy

Impact of anatomical bladder neck preservation on functional and oncologic outcomes after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical Prostatectomy - Problane

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

DRKS

Registry ID

DRKS00021096

Enrollment

238

Registered

2020-03-27

Start date

2020-07-05

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

C61 R32

Interventions

Group 1: non-bladderneck preserving technique Group 2: bladderneck preserving technique

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

Male

Age

18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients over the age of 18 years, performance of a radical prostatectomy with confirmed prostate carcinoma, declaration of consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Preoperatively pre-existing incontinence, preoperative suspicion of a bladder neck infiltrating growth, previous surgical or radiotherapy prostate treatment, previous operations in the small pelvis, previous radiotherapy in the small pelvis, Neurogenic voiding dysfunction, urethral stricture or bladder neck stenosis (preceding or existing), ongoing neuroleptic or antidepressive therapy

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Recovery of urinary incontinence 3 months after surgery	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Urinary incontinence 6 and 12 months after surgery, perioperative complications, oncological outcome (TNM, R-status, recurrence, metastasis), long-term complication rates, 24h pad test, uroflow, residual urine	—

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactAnita Thomas

Universitätsmedizin Mainz

anita.thomas@unimedizin-mainz.de06131 17 2312

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026