Skip to content

Pelvic ring fractures type C: What changed epidemiologically, diagnostically and therapeutically between 2004 and 2014? A retrospective data analysis of 2,042 patients by the German Pelvic Register (DGU)

Pelvic ring fractures type C: What changed epidemiologically, diagnostically and therapeutically between 2004 and 2014? A retrospective data analysis of 2,042 patients by the German Pelvic Register (DGU)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00020778
Enrollment
2042
Registered
2020-03-13
Start date
2019-03-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

pelvic fracture typ c

Interventions

Group 1: retrospective data analysis with the collection of epidemiological patient data (age, gender) at the time of injury, severity of injury, conservative vs. surgical therapy and for the surgical

Sponsors

Bundeswehrkrankenhaus UlmAbteilung Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Pelvic ring fractures type C

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Pelvic fractures type A and B and acebulum fractures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Data analysis until 31.12.2014

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Eliminates

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactPatricia Lang

Bundeswehrkrankenhaus Ulm

email@dr-patricia-lang.de00491791379887

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026