Skip to content

Intramedullary nailing with temporary ankle and subtalar arthrodesis versus external fixation in patients with infected non-unions of the distal tibia – a comparative retrospective analysis

Intramedullary nailing with temporary ankle and subtalar arthrodesis versus external fixation in patients with infected non-unions of the distal tibia – a comparative retrospective analysis

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00020552
Enrollment
28
Registered
2020-01-24
Start date
2019-12-18
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

M86.6 M84.1

Interventions

Group 1: Intramedullary nailing with temporary ankle and subtalar arthrodesis in patients with infected non-union of the distal tibia between 06/2015 and 02/2019, retrospective analysis. Group 2: Exte

Sponsors

BG Klinikum Duisburg
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Infected non-union of the distal tibia, osteosynthesis with either external fixation or intramedullary nail with temporary arthrodesis of the ankle and subtalar joint

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Ankle empyema - Other operative techniques (e.g. plate osteosynthesis)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Bony fusion

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
- Control of infection during follow-up - Full weight bearing - Range of motion of the ankle and subtalar joint - complications

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactEva Steinhausen

BG Klinikum Duisburg

evasimone.steinhausen@bg-klinikum-duisburg.de+49 203 7688 0

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026