Skip to content

Evaluation of the anthroposophic complex number in the DRG system - study on evaluation of the ZE26 additional reimbursement in the Havelhöhe community hospital (EVAL26)

Evaluation of the anthroposophic complex number in the DRG system - study on evaluation of the ZE26 additional reimbursement in the Havelhöhe community hospital (EVAL26) - EVAL26

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00020547
Enrollment
350
Registered
2020-09-21
Start date
2024-10-21
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-02-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

DRG OPS

Interventions

Group 1: In the Havelhöhe Community Hospital 500 to 700 patients annually receive complex anthroposophic medical treatment during their inpatient stay. A comprehensive therapy concept is applied here,

Sponsors

Institut für Sozialmedizin, Epidemiologie und Gesundheitsökonomie
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Persons of any gender from the age of 18 who have received complex anthroposophic medical treatment as part of their inpatient stay in the Havelhöhe Community Hospital. Ability to give consent and signed declaration of consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Lack of understanding of the German language. Severe acute and chronic illnesses that make it impossible to participate or complete the questionnaire.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
One-time survey of all patients who have completed an anthroposophic medical complex treatment (additional reimbursement ZE26, wit at least 25 units). Patients receive a newly developed questionnaire that takes into account and surveys patient satisfaction and patient-reported effectiveness of the general therapy setting and interaction with therapists during the complex treatment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary endpoints are general attitude and assessment of multimodal therapy, therapy process and setting, social interaction, problem awareness, perceived control, social support, attitude toward anthroposophic therapy, trait autonomous regulation. The following endpoints are considered for each individual therapeutic element: Self-reported satisfaction and effectiveness, attitude and assessment of the therapy element, satisfaction with the therapy setting, movement and inner congruence with eurythmy therapy, inner congruence and harmony with art therapies. The following validated questionnaires are used in the study: Trait Autonomous Regulation (Trait aR) by Kröz et al. (2008); Movement and Internal Congruence (ICPH) by Büssing et al. (2011); Internal Congruence and Consistency with Therapy (ICPTh) by Kröz et al. (2019). In addition, the study uses a not yet validated questionnaire on "Inner Congruence and Consistency with Therapy, Module Plasticising Therapy" (ICPMTh) by Kröz et al.

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactMaximilian Hinse

Institut für Sozialmedizin, Epidemiologie und Gesundheitsökonomie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte

maximilian.hinse@charite.de030 450529133

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026