Template-guided implantation of dental titanium implants. Influence of the implant system on the accuracy. A prospective controlled clinical pilot study

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

DRKS

Registry ID

DRKS00018939

Enrollment

Registered

2019-11-11

Start date

2020-02-20

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-01-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tooth loss

Interventions

Group 1: Replacement of a tooth with a dental implant. In this study. an newly on the market introduced implant system, will be examined for accuracy. A comparison to the older sysetem should be made

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: • Switching gaps in the upper and / or lower jaw tooth area • Free-end situations in the upper and / or lower jaw teeth • Stencil must be toothed. For this purpose, more than 5 remaining teeth must be present in the jaw to be implanted. • The patient has good oral hygiene and compliance. • A pre-implantation hygienic phase must be completed. • Patient's consent given

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: • Persons under 18 or non-legal persons • Untreated acute periodontitis with pocket depths> 4 mm. • strong smokers (more than 10 cents./d) • intake of bisphosphonates • Pregnant • Alcohol or drug addicts Patients with an infectious disease such as hepatitis or HIV or AIDS • Patients with severe diabetes m. • Planned immediate implantations • Planned immediate load

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Accuracy study of implant placement The study design and implementation of the clinical implementation and evaluation, including the statistical procedures, is based on three studies that have been carried out or are still in progress: 1. Retrospective study to determine the accuracy of template-guided implantation with a new non-X-ray-based matching method. Vote of the Ethics Commission Ulm No. 339/14 from 12.04.2014. Publication: Schnutenhaus et al. (2016) Retrospective study to determine the accuracy of template-guided implant placement using a novel nonradiologic evaluation method, Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2016; 121: e72-e79. Schnutenhaus et al. (2018): 3D accuracy of implant positions in template-guided implant placement as a function of the remaining teeth and the surgical procedure: a retrospective study. Clinical Oral Investigations [doi: 10.1007 / s00784-018-2339-8. [Epub ahead of print]] 2. Randomized controlled clinical study on the success of implants Socket preservation compared to a control group. Vote of the Ethics Committee Ulm No. 41/14 from 06.05.2014 Publication: Schnutenhaus et al. (2018) Accuracy of the match between CBCT and model scan data in template-guided implant planning: a prospective controlled clinical study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12614 Schnutenhaus et al. (2019): 3D accuracy of the implant position as a function of socket preservation measures - an RCT. In preparation. 3. Template-guided implantation of one-piece ceramic implants. A prospective controlled clinical pilot study. Vote of the Ethics Commission Ulm No. 268/17 dated 24.08.2017 Publication: Schnutenhaus et al. (2018) Precision of sleeveless 3D drill guides for insertion of one-piece ceramic implants. A prospective clinical trial. International Journal of Computerized Dentistry 2018; 21 (2): 133-146 It is a monocentric prospective controlled clinical trial. Patients requiring implant-prosthetic	—

Measure

Time frame

Accuracy study of implant placement The study design and implementation of the clinical implementation and evaluation, including the statistical procedures, is based on three studies that have been carried out or are still in progress: 1. Retrospective study to determine the accuracy of template-guided implantation with a new non-X-ray-based matching method. Vote of the Ethics Commission Ulm No. 339/14 from 12.04.2014. Publication: Schnutenhaus et al. (2016) Retrospective study to determine the accuracy of template-guided implant placement using a novel nonradiologic evaluation method, Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2016; 121: e72-e79. Schnutenhaus et al. (2018): 3D accuracy of implant positions in template-guided implant placement as a function of the remaining teeth and the surgical procedure: a retrospective study. Clinical Oral Investigations [doi: 10.1007 / s00784-018-2339-8. [Epub ahead of print]] 2. Randomized controlled clinical study on the success of implants Socket preservation compared to a control group. Vote of the Ethics Committee Ulm No. 41/14 from 06.05.2014 Publication: Schnutenhaus et al. (2018) Accuracy of the match between CBCT and model scan data in template-guided implant planning: a prospective controlled clinical study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12614 Schnutenhaus et al. (2019): 3D accuracy of the implant position as a function of socket preservation measures - an RCT. In preparation. 3. Template-guided implantation of one-piece ceramic implants. A prospective controlled clinical pilot study. Vote of the Ethics Commission Ulm No. 268/17 dated 24.08.2017 Publication: Schnutenhaus et al. (2018) Precision of sleeveless 3D drill guides for insertion of one-piece ceramic implants. A prospective clinical trial. International Journal of Computerized Dentistry 2018; 21 (2): 133-146 It is a monocentric prospective controlled clinical trial. Patients requiring implant-prosthetic

—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Technical problems Implementation of the planning, indication restrictions, hold and functionality of the drilling template	—

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactSigmar Schnutenhaus

Private Praxis und Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Klinik für Zahnärztliche Prothetik

sigmar.schnutenhaus@uniklinik-ulm.de07731 182755

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026