tooth-loss
Conditions
Interventions
Group 1: Replacement of a tooth with a dental implant. The aim of this study is to investigate the accuracy of two implant systems with a clearly different outer geometry. Due to the actively cutting
Sponsors
Private Praxis und Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Klinik für Zahnärztliche Prothetik
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: • Switching gaps in the upper and / or lower jaw tooth area • Free-end situations in the upper and / or lower jaw teeth • Stencil must be toothed. For this purpose, more than 5 remaining teeth must be present in the jaw to be implanted. • The patient has good oral hygiene and compliance. • A pre-implantation hygienic phase must be completed. • Patient's consent given.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: • Persons under 18 or non-legal persons • Untreated acute periodontitis with pocket depths> 4 mm. • strong smokers (more than 10 cents./d) • intake of bisphosphonates • Pregnant • Alcohol or drug addicts Patients with an infectious disease such as hepatitis or HIV or AIDS • Patients with severe diabetes m. • Planned immediate implantations • Planned immediate load
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Accuracy study of implant placement The study design and implementation of the clinical implementation and evaluation, including the statistical procedures, is based on three studies that have been carried out or are still in progress: 1. Retrospective study to determine the accuracy of template-guided implantation with a new non-X-ray-based matching method. Vote of the Ethics Commission Ulm No. 339/14 from 12.04.2014. Publication: Schnutenhaus et al. (2016) Retrospective study to determine the accuracy of template-guided implant placement using a novel nonradiologic evaluation method, Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2016; 121: e72-e79. Schnutenhaus et al. (2018): 3D accuracy of implant positions in template-guided implant placement as a function of the remaining teeth and the surgical procedure: a retrospective study. Clinical Oral Investigations [doi: 10.1007 / s00784-018-2339-8. [Epub ahead of print]] 2. Randomized controlled clinical study on the success of implants Socket preservation compared to a control group. Vote of the Ethics Committee Ulm No. 41/14 from 06.05.2014 Publication: Schnutenhaus et al. (2018) Accuracy of the match between CBCT and model scan data in template-guided implant planning: a prospective controlled clinical study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12614 Schnutenhaus et al. (2019): 3D accuracy of the implant position as a function of socket preservation measures - an RCT. In preparation. 3. Template-guided implantation of one-piece ceramic implants. A prospective controlled clinical pilot study. Vote of the Ethics Commission Ulm No. 268/17 dated 24.08.2017 Publication: Schnutenhaus et al. (2018) Precision of sleeveless 3D drill guides for insertion of one-piece ceramic implants. A prospective clinical trial. International Journal of Computerized Dentistry 2018; 21 (2): 133-146 The differences in the study presented here are that a modified template design is chosen and tw | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Technical problems Implementation of the planning, indication restrictions, hold and functionality of the drilling template | — |
Countries
Germany
Contacts
Public ContactSigmar Schnutenhaus
Private Praxis und Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Klinik für Zahnärztliche Prothetik
Outcome results
None listed