Skip to content

Feasibility and effectiveness of an individualized, group-based physical exercise program with educational components in people with knee and/or hip OA – a randomized controlled pilot study

Feasibility and effectiveness of an individualized, group-based physical exercise program with educational components in people with knee and/or hip OA – a randomized controlled pilot study - TREAT ME

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00018847
Enrollment
40
Registered
2019-11-18
Start date
2019-10-28
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Persons with hip and/or knee (osteo)arthrosis, which has been diagnosed by a physician. In addition, the criteria of the “American College of Rheumatology” for an idiopathic arthrosis of the hip joint (Altman et al., 1991) or an arthrosis of the knee joint (Altman et al., 1986) should be fulfilled. M15 M16 M17

Interventions

Group 1: Participants of the intervention group receive usual care plus an individualized, group-based exercise program combined with an educational part over a period of six weeks. In Germany, usual

Sponsors

Hochschule für Gesundheit, Bochum
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
38 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: • Persons who suffer from knee and/or hip osteoarthrosis • Hip osteoarthrosis 50 years • Knee osteoarthrosis 38 years • Arthrosis diagnosed by a physician (following ICD-10: M15 – Primary generalized (osteo)arthrosis, M16 – Coxarthrosis [arthrosis of hip] and/or M17 – Gonarthrosis [arthrosis of knee] • Fulfilment of the criteria of the “American College of Rheumatology” (ACR) for an idiopathic arthrosis of the knee joint (Altmann et al., 1986) or the hip joint (Altman et al., 1991)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: • In case of uncertainties regarding the suitability for physical training and without medical consent regarding the suitability for physical training. • Persons who participate in a systematic physical training of more than two hours per week with the aim of decreasing osteoarthrosis-related symptoms. • Patients who are on a waiting list for the implantation of a total endoprosthesis (TEP), who already have a fixed appointment for this or whose affected joint has already been replaced by a TEP.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Feasibility: The feasibility of the chosen methodological approach in the study as well as the feasibility including the acceptability by persons with hip and/or knee osteoarthrosis are operationalized according to published recommendations (Thabane et al., 2010; Eldridge et al., 2016) on the basis of predefined criteria in the domains of study design including randomization, measurement instruments, costs, intervention, assessment of effects of the intervention and effort. Effectiveness: Complaints caused by hip and/or knee osteoarthrosis are assessed by standardized questionnaires “Hip Osteoarthritis Outcome Score“ (HOOS) (Blasimann, Dauphinee, & Staal, 2014) and „Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score“ (KOOS) (Collins, Misra, Felson, Crossley, & Roos, 2011; Kessler, Lang, Puhl, & Stöve, 2003) before and after the intervention period within three weeks.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Effectiveness: Secondary outcome measures are also assessed before and after the intervention period within three weeks. [1] Mobility, assessed with the six-minute walk test (Ateef, Kulandaivelan, & Tahseen, 2016; Dobson et al., 2017; Enright, 2003). [2] Range of motion of hip and knee, assessed with a goniometer using the neutral-0-method (Ryf & Weymann, 1999). [3] Strength, assessed with a force dynamometer (Muff, G. et al., 2016; Awward et al., 2017). [4] Physical performance: functional interaction of strength, flexibility and proprioception (in individual cases), assessed with the Y Balance Test (Coughlan et al., 2012; Plisky et al., 2009). [5] Occupational performance, assessed with the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) (Law, 2015). [6] Measuring coping strategies for pain and its evaluation, assessed with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, German version (Meyer, Sprott, & Mannion, 2008; Verra & Winteler, 2015).

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactFranziska Weber

Hochschule für Gesundheit, Bochum

franziska.weber@hs-gesundheit.de023477727625

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026