Comparison of different fixation systems for peripheral vein catheters: force required for dislocation and cost-effectiveness

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

DRKS

Registry ID

DRKS00018106

Enrollment

200

Registered

2019-09-11

Start date

2019-09-15

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

healthy volutneers

Interventions

Group 1: Different bonding techniques are compared with each other, but there is no venous puncture of the test persons. The plastic tube of the cannula is cut of. Arm 1: prefabricated fixation devi

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: healthy volunteers

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Lack of voluntariness, cortisone intake, skin diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Primary endpoint : maximum force required [ Newton] to dislocate a peripheral intravenous cannula.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Secondary endpoints: - mean force and impulse force ie for dislocation of a peripheral intravenous cannula - subjective assessment of the test subjects regarding the forces leading to the dislocation	—

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactSebastian Heinrich

Uniklinik Freiburg Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin

sebastian.heinrich@uniklinik-freiburg.de0049 761 27027930

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026