Skip to content

Comparison of treatment outcome with a full-occlusion biofeedback splint on sleep bruxism and TMD pain compared to treatment with an adjusted occlusal splint

Comparison of treatment outcome with a full-occlusion biofeedback splint on sleep bruxism and TMD pain compared to treatment with an adjusted occlusal splint - biofeedback study bruxism

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00018092
Enrollment
41
Registered
2020-05-06
Start date
2015-10-08
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

F45.8

Interventions

Group 1: test group: biofeedback splint therapy and questionnaires Group 2: control group: adjusted occlusal splint therapy and questionnaires

Sponsors

Poliklinik für Zahnärztliche Prothetik LMU
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: (1) physical signs of bruxism visible on the dentition (grinding facets, abnormal tooth wear and/or wedge-shaped lesions) (2) self-reported pain in the masticatory muscles and/or the temporomandibular joint (“TMJ”) (3) willingness of the patient to participate in the study and a commitment to adhere to the pre-set timetable.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: (1) acute pain caused by other components of the masticatory system (e.g. caries, root inflammation) (2) prior or planned TMJ or dysgnathia surgery (3) jaw fractures, (4) otorhinolaryngologic diseases (except tinnitus), (5) systemic basic illness with rheumatic origin e.g. arthritis, arthrosis, gout and psoriasis, (6) psychosomatic or psychiatric diseases, (7) implanted electronic devices, (8) arrhythmia and other (prior or present) cardiac problems, (9) epilepsy, (10) cerebrovascular and brain diseases, (11) pregnancy including breastfeeding period, (12) drug or alcohol abuse, analgesic or sedative therapy, use of medication affecting the central nervous system (e.g. antidepressants, anxiolytics and anticonvulsants), (13) physical or mental disability, (14) maxillary hyperesthesia and/or allergy to materials used, (15) missing support zones in the posterior region or anatomical topography which made a full-coverage maxillary splint impossible to use, (16) a past history of received biofeedback therapy and (17) insufficient recorded bruxing activity in the baseline phase

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Recording of bruxism activity 2018

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Aquisition of questionnaire and clinical examination 2018

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactAlexander Bergmann

Poliklinik für Zahnärztliche Prothetik

alexander.bergmann@med.uni-muenchen.de+4989440059501

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026