Acetabular fracture S32.4
Conditions
Interventions
Group 1: modified Stoppa-approach (plus first window ilioinguinal)
Group 2: Pararectus approach
Sponsors
BG Unfallklinik TübingenKlinik für Unfall- und WiederherstellungschirurgieEberhard Karls Universität Tübingen
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: acetabular fracture surgery via Stoppa approach or Pararectus approach
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: < 18 years Surgery via another surgical approach
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Approach-related complication rate The complications were recorded at each study site during the inpatient treatment. The data were entered into the database. The following complications were recorded: Surgical site infections (SSI), nerval lesions, vascular lesions, injury of adjacent organs / structures (e.g. spermatic cord in male patients). | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Quality of reduction The quality of reduction was checked by either a postoperative X-ray (iliac-oblique / Obturator-oblique) or by a postoperative CT scan. The maximal residual fracture step-off was measured in mm. According to Matta, the quality of reduction is graded as follows: grade 1 (anatomical): 0-2mm residual step-off, grade 2 (imperfect): 2-3mm residual step-off, grade 3 (poor): >3mm residual step-off. | — |
Countries
Germany
Contacts
Public ContactMarkus Küper
BG Unfallklinik TübingenKlinik für Unfall- und WiederherstellungschirurgieEberhard Karls Universität Tübingen
Outcome results
None listed