Skip to content

Comparison of mobile oxygenconcentrators: fixed Minute volume System vs. constant Bolus System

Comparison of mobile oxygenconcentrators: fixed Minute volume System vs. constant Bolus System - [---]*

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00017000
Enrollment
25
Registered
2019-04-01
Start date
2019-07-17
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

J44.8

Interventions

Group 1: Examination of patients with COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) Gold IV in a stable state of their disease. An arterial BGA (Arterial blood gas test) will be performed the necessity

Sponsors

Kliniken der Stadt Köln
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with COPD GOLD IV (FEV118 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients 25 acute exacerbation of COPD defined as acute worsening of respiratory Symptoms which require a Change of therapy [Christian Viniol, Claus F. Vogelmeie r- European Respiratory Review 2018 27: 170103] no written consent absolute contraindication for arterial BGA

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Final operating Level of the OCD device Zen O Lite and final operating Level of the OCD device Inogen One.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
- Comparison of 6 MWT with each OCD device after first 6MWT (Walking distance, BORG Dyspnoea, Desaturation >4% to 4% to 4% to <90%, Breathing frequency before and after Intervention) - highest setting necessary of OCD - Preference of patients - pneumologic Standard diagnostics such as spirometry, bodyplethysmography and diffusion

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactWolfram Windisch

Kliniken der Stadt - Lungenklinik

windischw@kliniken-koeln.de0221890718929

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026