Clinical and radiomorphological predictors of outcome and implant failure after open-book pelvic injuries/symphyseal disruption

Clinical and radiomorphological predictors of outcome and implant failure after open-book pelvic injuries/symphyseal disruption - OPEN

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

DRKS

Registry ID

DRKS00016759

Enrollment

Registered

2019-02-22

Start date

2017-08-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

S33.4 S32.7

Interventions

Group 1: Retrospective study, examination of all patients in the center with a traumatic symphysis rupture, evaluation of the file data size, weight, sex, age, trauma type, mortality, duration of hosp

follow-up with Majeed Pelvic Scores, Iowa Pelvic Scores, Pelvic Discomfort Index and SF-36 either outpatient or by telephone

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Pelvic ring injuries with existing Open Book fracture as sole injury or in combination with another pelvic ring fracture: B1, B3.1, B3.2 and C according to Tile or APC, VS and CM injuries according to Young and Burgess - Age >18 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Patients with additional acetabular fractures and other pelvic ring injuries - Pregnant patients - Refusal to participate in the study (with regard to the follow-up examination)

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
1. Determination of concomitant injuries and the time of surgery and their influence on pelvic specific outcomes scores (Majeed Pelvic Score, Iowa Pelvic Score, Pelvic Discomfort Index) and on the pelvic non-specific SF-36 2. Identification of displacements and instabilities by radiographic measurement and CT-based 3D reconstructions and correlation of these with implant failure and clinical outcome.	—

Measure

Time frame

1. Determination of concomitant injuries and the time of surgery and their influence on pelvic specific outcomes scores (Majeed Pelvic Score, Iowa Pelvic Score, Pelvic Discomfort Index) and on the pelvic non-specific SF-36 2. Identification of displacements and instabilities by radiographic measurement and CT-based 3D reconstructions and correlation of these with implant failure and clinical outcome.

—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1. Investigation of the concomitant injury with the greatest influence on the outcome. 2. Determination of the pelvic-specific score that correlates most closely with the overall quality of life (SF-36). 3. Determination of the (temporal) influence of the concomitant injuries on surgical care. 4. Influence of the time of the surgical treatment on the outcome after an open book fracture. 5. Identification of radiologically measured instabilities that influence implant failure and outcome. 6. Comparison of specific instabilities in the measurement of radiographs and CT-based 3D reconstructions. 7. Influence of implant failure on clinical outcome	—

Measure

Time frame

1. Investigation of the concomitant injury with the greatest influence on the outcome. 2. Determination of the pelvic-specific score that correlates most closely with the overall quality of life (SF-36). 3. Determination of the (temporal) influence of the concomitant injuries on surgical care. 4. Influence of the time of the surgical treatment on the outcome after an open book fracture. 5. Identification of radiologically measured instabilities that influence implant failure and outcome. 6. Comparison of specific instabilities in the measurement of radiographs and CT-based 3D reconstructions. 7. Influence of implant failure on clinical outcome

—

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactPhilipp Pieroh

Klinik für Orthopädie, Unfallchirurgie und Plastische Chirurgie

Philipp.Pieroh@medizin.uni-leipzig.de03419720660

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026