Skip to content

Implementation and efficacy testing of acupuncture and exercise therapy in patients with frequent episodic and chronic tension-type headache on pain perception and quality of life: A pilot / feasibility study

Implementation and efficacy testing of acupuncture and exercise therapy in patients with frequent episodic and chronic tension-type headache on pain perception and quality of life: A pilot / feasibility study - AkuTrainTTH

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00016723
Enrollment
96
Registered
2019-02-11
Start date
2018-07-24
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

G44.2

Interventions

Group 1: Acupuncture Group 2: Medical training therapy Group 3: Combination of acupuncture and medical training therapy Group 4: Usual care

Sponsors

Tasly Healthcare Deutschland GmbH
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients aged between 18 and 65 years, suffering from frequent episodic or chronic tension-type headache for more than 6 months. According to these criteria, an episode of headache has to occur at least on one day per month for at least 3 months and the duration of the headache attack must be at least 30 minutes, but no longer than 7 days continuously. Furthermore, subjects have to be capable of fully completing the assessments used.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients participating at the time of, or having participated during the last 30 days prior to, the initial screening examination in another clinical trial or who have been treated with acupuncture or MTT for tension-type headache within the last 6 months prior to the initial examination will be excluded from the study. Furthermore, subjects who fulfil one of the following criteria will also be excluded: serious psychiatric disorder; substance dependence and/or misuse; use of headache medication on >10 days/month; severe neurological and/or severe medical diseases; pregnant women and nursing women (planned pregnancy during the study period); patients with migraine if attacks occur more frequently than once per year; unstable angina pectoris; NYHA III-IV heart failure; uncontrollable or untreatable arterial hypertension; other medical causes of headache (e.g. pseudotumor cerebri, sleep apnea syndrome, newly developed daily headache).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
change in mean pain intensity (numerical rating scale) before the start of the intervention (T1) compared with the pain intensity 6 weeks after the end of the intervention (T3)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
One of the secondary endpoint is the frequency of pain episodes in days/month, from which, besides the rate of responders (at least 50% pain reduction), the frequency of occurrence can be calculated. Other secondary endpoints are episode duration of the headache attacks, consumption of pain medication for tension-type headache, health-related quality of life, effect of headache on fitness and functional impairments (activities and participation), information about psychological health (mood, drive, anxiety, etc.), as well as autonomic factors (sleep-wake rhythm). These outcomes will be measured using the MIDAS questionnaire, parts of the PHQ-D , PHQ-9 , GAD-7 questionnaires, and the SF-12 questionnaire. Since depressed mood and anxiety have a significant influence on pain experience and coping, a short written assessment of the fear of the treatment will be performed—besides the standardized assessments of anxiety and depression (T0-T4, PHQ-9; GAD-7)—to evaluate treatment expectations and mood , . After written and verbal instructions, the patients will independently complete the questionnaires. The completed questionnaires will then be passed on to the study nurse in a closed envelope with the study ID. The outcome parameters will be entered into a database by a member of the scientific staff, who is not involved in the treatment process, and then be reviewed by two of the principal investigators. Measuring individual psychological stress levels The effect of the interventions on individual psychological stress levels is determined by measuring treatment-related changes in heart rate variability. Furthermore, by measuring HRV during acupuncture, distinct types of response to the stimulus shall be explored and their potential influence on the efficacy of the treatment be evaluated. Clinical examination for temporomandibular dysfunction: Whether a patient suffers from TMD is determined using the RDC/TMD criteria. The Research Diagnostic Criteria for Tempo

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactJoerg Schiller

Medizinische Hochschule Hannover

Schiller.joerg@mh-hannover.de0511-5324128

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026