Comparison of ocular- and monitor-based interventions

Comparison of ocular- and monitor-based interventions - Exoscope study

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

DRKS

Registry ID

DRKS00016674

Enrollment

Registered

2019-02-05

Start date

2018-05-14

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

supratentorial non-eloquent brain tumors

Interventions

Group 1: conventional stereoscopic ocular-based surgery Group 2: digital 3D4k monitor-based surgery

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: circumscribed supratentorial lesion in non-eloquent location, age > 18 years, eligibility for both modalities, operating surgeon trained in both modalities

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: multimorbidity

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
The study investigates the impact of the new operating mode (monitor-based) on intraoperative workflows in comparison with the established standard (surgical microscope wirth oculars).	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
The study further investigates the surgeons' satisfaction with the new device (exoscope) in comparison with the established standard (surgical microscope wirth oculars) using validated questionnaires (System Usability Scale, Surgical Task Load Index) and short user interviews.	—

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactThomas Picht

Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin

thomas.picht@charite.de030450660423

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026